I haven't played bingo in ages... we used to do it in school, usually as the teachers trying a sneaky way to get us to learn.
But as for that robbery, it couldn't have happened - according to the MPD GFSZ map that corner has a school (probably in the church), so guns are prohibited there. Why on earth would a bunch of little old ladies make up such a story?
But as for that robbery, it couldn't have happened - according to the MPD GFSZ map that corner has a school (probably in the church), so guns are prohibited there.
One woman who had not played bingo at the church hall in years said one of the robbers put a handgun to her daughter's face before grabbing her purse and fleeing.
Call me crazy, but I believe with all my heart that if this thug criminal who put a gun to a girls head ended up shot DEAD by a law-abiding citizen in self-defense it would send a really nice message to other criminals that "its not worth it".
Call me crazy, but I believe with all my heart that if this thug criminal who put a gun to a girls head ended up shot DEAD by a law-abiding citizen in self-defense it would send a really nice message to other criminals that "its not worth it".
Suspects arrested http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/100695654.html Was it a licensed game IAW Chapter 563?
would they not be in violation of a federal law GFSZ or is that state only? if federal send them to marion illinois pen
if state law then send them to supermax for 100 years
Call me crazy said:+1, here's a poem for the bad guys
He held a gun
Up to my head
I pulled out mine
And shot him dead
He held a gun
Up to her head
I pulled out mine
And shot him dead
would they not be in violation of a federal law GFSZ or is that state only? if federal send them to marion illinois pen
if state law then send them to supermax for 100 years
I doubt that anyone would get sent to prison via the federal statute. I don't know of any cases that went any farther than a charge since Lopez. The reason is that I believe they think it will be found unconstitutional once again (see U.S v. Hoffmeyer). So, my guess is that they are leaving it on the books and use it to threaten to charge/charge and plea out, just as a detterant. I don't think they want it to go to trial and mess up their detterant.
Basically all the congress did after Lopez was to pass the law again and say "I assure you it is constitutional" I'm paraphrasing of course.
I doubt that anyone would get sent to prison via the federal statute. I don't know of any cases that went any farther than a charge since Lopez.
I do... I need to go grab some notes and I'll post links.