Brass Magnet
Founder's Club Member
No, it means that they have no way to preclude what they cannot see. In other words, it would leave private property owners without effeicient means to exercise thier right.
That brings up an interesting point. I know we have had our disagreements in this area in the past Brokensproket and won't get into that but:
What would stop a private property owner from installing a metal detector? I agree it may not be efficient but as staunch a private property rights supporter as I am I don't see any reason they can't preclude it.
For example, as private property owner I should be able to disallow anyone with herpes coming into my store and trying on clothes, or sitting on my toilet seats (You know, where everyone seems to catch STD's :lol but I have no efficient way of checking that either.
This might be borderline but it's an interesting argument. That all being said, I don't disagree that a person choosing to conceal when a private property owner disallows it is in the wrong.