imported post
I have kind of changed my mind, or at least clarified my thinking on open carry. While I whole heartedly support it and wish to see it available as much as possible, I do not think it's always the best idea to practice open carry at all times and at all places. I think common sense discretion is important so as to not unnecessarily frighten people and cause public relations problems with guns and gun owners at a time of unparalleled public acceptance of the second amendment.
It appears that individuals testing the waters provoked this response from the Topeka PD and city council. If they repeal the open carry law you now have there, then we will have lost.
Frankly, there are many times and places that do not require carrying guns. But in the event of disasters and riots and other disturbances if the right remains, you have the option available. If open carry is lost to Topeka, when trouble comes and your packing openly, they WILL confiscate your gun unless your on your property.
Topeka is a case where open carry when not really needed provoked a negative response and probably your going to lose the option.
In Mission Ks where I live, if I open carried everywhere I went, I guarantee a new city ordinance would be passed within weeks banning it. But if I did not provoke such a reaction and a wave of rabble crossed the creek over into Mission and began rioting, I could pack and not get in trouble.
I just think open carry is not applicable in all places in all times. To think otherwise is just being unrealistic. We have made HUGE strides as gun owners over the past 45 years. Concealed carry is available at a scale unimaginable a decade ago.
This could all change if open carry is carried to extremes. The reality is, this is Kansas, not Wyoming or Arizona. In the cow trail days in the old cow towns, they banned guns on the streets. We don't have the tradition of open carry as a publicly accepted practice.