• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

why 21?

P

protias

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
7,308
Location
SE, WI
apjonas said:
Think about the consequences of unfettered "liberty" - rights without responsibility.
Click to expand...
Age is meaningless. Again, there are many "kids" who are far more responsible than some "adults."

To bear means to carry.

What rules are different?

Then a responsible person would get the means on how to drive, or in this case, shoot.
Schlitz said:
I'm all for lowering the age for veterans... But what about the guys who enlist in the national guard as a junior in high school, go to basic training that summer, then go back to finish their senior year. Do you want seniors in high school at 17 years old carrying guns? Is it a bad idea? I haven't developed my opinion on that yet.
Click to expand...
There are some children who I'd trust my life over some 40+ year olds. Neither state or federal Constitution has an age limit, places not to carry, method of carry, etc. Both reiterate our ability to carry, how, when, and where we choose, or not choose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top