GreatWhiteLlama
Regular Member
imported post
HankT wrote:
It's been mentioned that the panhandler had a history of being aggressive, which would not justify deadly force, but if he was under the influence, (highly unlikely for a panhandler :uhoh he could have snapped and went too far, at which point it would. I imagine this will be the determining factor at trial.
HankT wrote:
HankT wrote:
A 62 year old woman being assaulted by someone who is armed or not, would be justification for deadly force.But there has been no mention that he wasarmed so that seems unlikely at this point."
"Why on earth would anyone ever shoot a bum if he was unarmed?
It's been mentioned that the panhandler had a history of being aggressive, which would not justify deadly force, but if he was under the influence, (highly unlikely for a panhandler :uhoh he could have snapped and went too far, at which point it would. I imagine this will be the determining factor at trial.
HankT wrote:
Run away huh? You wouldn't happen to be European would you?I'd just flip him a quarter, tell him no way, or run away from him.