thaJack
Regular Member
o Aurora police officers had specific, credible information and were certain that the armed bank robbery suspect was in one of 19 cars stopped at the intersection.
Even if a random search has a 1 in 19 chance of catching a criminal it does not produce RAS.
o Eventually, the police identified and arrested the suspect, in part through technology and in part through the goodwill and patience of the other citizens involved.
Re-iterating the fact that the ends justify the means?
In the end, the process of identifying the suspect took longer than anyone anticipated. Police Chief Oates has publicly apologized for that.
The moron is apologizing for the WRONG THING!
The City Attorney is comfortable that the officers' actions were lawful, given the extraordinarily unusual and dangerous circumstances of the event.
I would argue that there was no danger.
It was the positive and cooperative assistance of our residents that day that led to the arrest of a very dangerous criminal who is now facing federal prosecution.
This line should read: "It was the positive and cooperative assistance of the sheep that day that led to the arrest of a very dangerous criminal who will now walk free because the evidence we gathered was fruit of a poisoned tree. However, the chief, mayor and City Attorney are not sure yet what a poisoned tree is. They believe it is some kind of legal term."