Does the kind of insurance required even exist?
Right, but unless you can get a preliminary injunction against the requirement (has one ever been granted for a 2A case?) you're stuck with the mandated insurance for the duration of litigation (years), and possibly without a gun entirely if nobody offers it (which I presume is the hope of the authors of this bill). "Nobody offering it" could be helped along with changes in insurance regulations.It cannot be constitutional to impose a discriminatory tax selectively impinging on the expression of a fundamental Constitutional right, right?
i foresee people kidnapping the children of the legislators to ransom them for cash to pay the tax.
Oh well....sucks to be them
we advocate for the law abiding only
I foresee people kidnapping the children of the legislators to ransom them for cash to pay the tax.
Oh well....sucks to be them