Lol to that first pic... a huge uprising of anti's against gun owners... well, guess who's got the superior firepower lady! Man, they just don't think things through...
She seems to have completely overlooked that part.
Post screenshots of antis saying funny things. Not just stupid things, but things that are really funny. Yes, funny is subjective, but the point is that we're trying to laugh here, not get mad here. We can be mad elsewhere.![]()
Rusty, I had forgotten how funny that washahaha
Before that video came out, I would do (what I THOUGHT was) a pretty good impersonation of an anti going full-auto stupid; some of my posts on OCDO made sarcastic mention to "evil, black, high-caliber, large-power, puppy-kicking assault clip weapons". Then DeLeon comes along and completely blows my best impression out of the water.:lol:
Now, another funny video (I know, you asked for screenshots, I just figured the videos could be pretty entertaining as well).
First off, I'd like to mention that I didn't feel the "primal instincts" these guys are talking about the first time I ever fired a gun (bolt action, Mosin Nagant to be precise) at around the age of 9, or the first time I fired semi auto anything (which was about three years ago).
Maybe I'm just not "masculine" enough to lose control like the anti-gunners.:lol:
<video>
+1Oh, videos are cool, too, for sure!
I can only imagine that their reaction is a result of a certain immaturity. Yes, absolutely, shooting can be fun, and a rush, probably especially for first time shooters, but to liken a firearm to a toy, or imply that the fact it's fun precludes any other legitimate use, I think is very immature. There are plenty of activities and tools which can be fun to do or use, but are quite dangerous and require a certain maturity to participate in or use. I think if they conclude that they aren't mature enough or responsible enough to own or possess firearms, then perhaps they should be free to choose not to. For them to conclude that, because they aren't mature or responsible enough, they should be able to prohibit others from owning or possessing firearms, is quite illogical. Their notion that a firearm could potentially make them feel like more of a man is also a pretty significant immaturity and misunderstanding. What makes a man a man? It certainly isn't the possession of a firearm. That goes without saying. Perhaps it'd be more accurate to say that a man is someone that would stand firm in their principle and resolve, rather than attempt to impose unjustified prohibitions on others out of fear of a loss of control.
I mean, come on... Part of the constitution is unconstitutional? XD hahaha
And next... A civil war between gun owners and everyone that doesn't own guns? REALLY? hahaha