press1280
Regular Member
imported post
The Heller case has at least changed the "collective" rights to "individual" rights. I've been doing a LOT of research and these liberal courts have ALWAYS said it's a collective right of the militia. Although they'll probably say now that the 2A doesn't apply to the states.
However, if that were true, MD could ban ALL firearms tomorrow, and no one could do a thing about it. Does anyone think MD would win in court doing something like that?
The Heller case has at least changed the "collective" rights to "individual" rights. I've been doing a LOT of research and these liberal courts have ALWAYS said it's a collective right of the militia. Although they'll probably say now that the 2A doesn't apply to the states.
However, if that were true, MD could ban ALL firearms tomorrow, and no one could do a thing about it. Does anyone think MD would win in court doing something like that?