The URL leads to a wordpress.com sign-up page thus seems defective.
**BIG NEWS!** I filed my Volume 4 Amended Complaint adding the United Nations as lead defendant. This changes my case from Hamrick, pro se -v- President Bush, et al to Hamrick, (a.k.a. Non-State Actor), pro se -v- United Nations, et al.
The NRA cannot allow the removal of infringements to the Second Amendment because the sale of dispensations (a-la the Catholic Church pre-reformation) from these infringements is the raison d'etre of the NRA. Follow the money.the NRA is ignoring him.
Thanks for the correct link, RedKnight. I don't have time to read through it now but I've bookmarked it for future perusal as time allows.Your link doesn't work; I think you misspelled "Common" as "Coommon".
corrected link: http://americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/
(dang, take a few minutes to type up a post and 4 posts appear ahead of you )
IIRC, I saw this gentleman passing out a small handout concerning his case while waiting in line (in the rain ) at the Sept Dulles gun show. He is/was a merchant seaman trying to get universal open carry established both nationally and internationally and was talking about how the NRA is ignoring him.
--RedKnightt--
May I introduce you to LEO 229 and HankT because they accuse much as you do. I did not write/say/think 'phishing'. I do practice C^3 and Keep It Simple, Stupid. Brevity is the soul of wit.Always a bad-mouther in a group.
I AM NOT PHISHING! But I am "fishing" for grassroots support for my case.
It may be tacky but I fail to see how being tacky is meaningful as to whether a court has jurisdiction or not.The National Ensign does not have a gold fringe. You may believe that the gold fringe is an innocent embellishment but others do not. I just think that it's tacky and gaudy quite befitting a State that may elect an Obamination.
isn't don hamrick the nut case that thinks that the gold fringe on the flag in court rooms somehow invalidates their rulings?