Well, if you won't be then I will. Until this BS is fixed, eff Midvale PD! :cuss:by NO means am i agenst the police department of any city
File a federal lawsuit.SGT Jensen wrote:gotta love you SGTStuartG wrote:Well, if you won't be then I will. Until this BS is fixed, eff Midvale PD! :cuss:by NO means am i agenst the police department of any city
just a update to the days activity my self and james along with another person of whom i will not name unless given permission to do so went down to midvale PD to try and speak to the chief and the captain over the officer who issues the ticket.
neither of witch would speak to us they informed us that it was turned over to the prosecuting attorney at this time we left the police station and the gentalman ( who is very knowledgeable of the gun laws and had the full law book with him and was advising us threw it all and has said he will continue till it is settled ) called the attorney on my behalf and spoke to him i am unaware at this time as to what took place in that phone call.
i was advices to wait for the 5-14 days to be able to set up a court date ( paliminary hearing ) and plead not guilty to the chargers at this point i have been told that being charged with.
76-10-505 WILL NOT hold up agenst me as 76-10-523 states i am exempt.
this is pretty much all i have to be able to update you all at this time as i get information i will be posting it up here .
also i was told until this hole matter is settle i will not be receiving my firearm and ammunition back.
i am still completely open to all advice you all wish to give on this and i do thank you all again
Were you asked to disclose your SSNs without being advised of your right to refuse per Section 7 of the Federal Privacy Act? if so, you have a great federal cause of action in civil suit should you go that route.images below have had certian parts of the name,adress,social removed for protection
huh? A round under the hammer where the hammer is not cocked would not be "loaded" under Utah law.Well then, I misread your post. For some reason I thought that your friend had one under the hammer, that would have been a bad idea without a CFP.
mqondo wrote:huh? A round under the hammer where the hammer is not cocked would not be "loaded" under Utah law.Well then, I misread your post. For some reason I thought that your friend had one under the hammer, that would have been a bad idea without a CFP.
What is a 'firing position"? A firing position for a revolver would be the chamber ready to be advanced to be fired, right? unless you have case law otherwise, I don;t see how a bullet in a position which cannot be fired cn be "in the firing position"Mike wrote:mqondo wrote:huh? A round under the hammer where the hammer is not cocked would not be "loaded" under Utah law.Well then, I misread your post. For some reason I thought that your friend had one under the hammer, that would have been a bad idea without a CFP.
76-10-502. When weapon deemed loaded.
(1) For the purpose of this chapter, any pistol, revolver, shotgun, rifle, or other weapon described in this part shall be deemed to be loaded when there is an unexpended cartridge, shell, or projectile in the firing position.
(2) Pistols and revolvers shall also be deemed to be loaded when an unexpended cartridge, shell, or projectile is in a position whereby the manual operation of any mechanism once would cause the unexpended cartridge, shell, or projectile to be fired.
(3) A muzzle loading firearm shall be deemed to be loaded when it is capped or primed and has a powder charge and ball or shot in the barrel or cylinders.