JoeSparky
Centurion
Saved by the straw buying law!:lol:
Buying a gift for someone LEGALLY ELIGIBLE to own a firearm IS NOT a straw purchase.... Look at the 4473 FORM INSTRUCTIONS!
Saved by the straw buying law!:lol:
if i was buying straw, i'd have a horse. i'll strike my comment.....looks left, looks right.....actually i'm pretty good right now. you guys go ahead, but then drop by the shop so i can see what you got!
Buying a gift for someone LEGALLY ELIGIBLE to own a firearm IS NOT a straw purchase.... Look at the 4473 FORM INSTRUCTIONS!
I'll take another XD, but I want to add a FNP-45 to my collection.You can buy a gun for anyone that can legally possess it. That is correct. It is only a straw purchase when the purchase is to provide a gun to someone who CANNOT legally possess it.
I'll take another Glock please!
I look forward to seeing it.Ch. 4 called me for an interview, taped it with them about 10 minutes ago. Should run on CH. 4 at 5 and 6:30
Congress passed a law in 2005 that limited civil lawsuits against gun dealers, manufacturers and other firearms-related businesses.
"The federal law looks like a significant obstacle unless facts come out this seller on this occasion knowingly violated federal law or sold to someone they knew would misuse it," said Harvard University Law Professor John Goldberg.
Halbrook argued a dealer's gun traces is misleading because police may trace every gun they seize, even if they aren't from a crime scene. The more important factor, he said, is if the gun dealer is following the law.
Such lawsuits, even if unsuccessful, are a strategic attack on the dealers, he said.
"A lot of these cases are to harass the store to pay attorney fees and drive them out of business," Halbrook said.
Badger should demand attorneys fees when they "answer" the complaint. That way there, when the judge dismisses these two officer( and I mean go after them directly) will be stuck holding the bill.
I agree 100%. It is the only way to stop this kind of stuff.
Also great job on TV Nic. It was short, but you did a good job again, thanks.
I could not find the video, so here is the article: http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/106147218.html
I was born and raised in Wisconsin for thrity-seven years. I moved to Louisville, ky and I love here and would never move back to Wisconsin (liberal) State. Due to the fact that they violating your Constitutional Right. the 2nd Admendment. I read horror stories about citizens being killed, rob, and mug there. All due to the fact that Wisconsin will not give the citizen the right to bear arms. If they which to allow CCDW permits-I think some of the crime will go down due to the fact that predators will have to think twice about their felonous actions. They wouldn't know who is packing and run the risk of shot or maybe killed. Don't get me wrong now, I know any where ever you go there is going to be crime but Wisconsin is crazy. You can't protect yourself or your love ones from danger. But still they want you to call LE when something goes wrong, by then its to late. If I was a Wisconsinite I will be mad as hell about the situation.
If I step on anyone toes in here I will apologize up front but something got to give and If its up to LE it will be the law-abiding citizen who works hard for the things they have. For some thug to come and just take it all and reak havoc on a family. Like I said early I am so glad that I got the hell out Wisconsin and have the freedom of protecting my love ones if something which to happen. Good luck Wisconsinites.
All due to the fact that Wisconsin will not give the citizen the right to bear arms.