28kfps
Regular Member
Agree with, a person’s home is his castle. However an advertising business open to the public encouraging the general public in is not the same as ones home. Many are spending millions on advertising to all to come on in. The general public believing they are being encouraged and welcomed in as long as they are conducting themselves in a legal manner.
I understanding for the most part private property laws do not separate business from a home, however comparing home rights to open to the public business rights in my opinion is asinine.
An example a mom and pop business with their home attached to the business one is not going to just walk into their home as they would into the business.
Our government has already shown that private businesses are only allowed to have rules the government agrees with. Private property or not. Rules the government says is unconstitutional are not allowed in a private business. However, our government has decided that a constitutional protected right can be trumped by a rule. If gun rights were as popular as gay rights private business would not be allowed to stop open carried firearms.
I understanding for the most part private property laws do not separate business from a home, however comparing home rights to open to the public business rights in my opinion is asinine.
An example a mom and pop business with their home attached to the business one is not going to just walk into their home as they would into the business.
Our government has already shown that private businesses are only allowed to have rules the government agrees with. Private property or not. Rules the government says is unconstitutional are not allowed in a private business. However, our government has decided that a constitutional protected right can be trumped by a rule. If gun rights were as popular as gay rights private business would not be allowed to stop open carried firearms.
Last edited: