Are you prepared for the riots?

[MKEgal]

Assuming we all nail down a clear definition of "riot" so there's no equivocation after the fact, I'd be willing to put up $50 on the "no riot" side.

How are we going to distinguish a riot from the 'normal' behaviour of gangs randomly attacking people on the street, gangs swarming a store to plunder & destroy, etc.?

I think the urban terrorists are already in full swing, and have been using the Zimmerman trial to stir up marginal people (people who needed encouragement to go wild) and encourage the ones who already commit crimes.

No matter which way the verdict goes (and I think he has to be found not guilty, if the jury is honest), there will be riots, attacks, arsons, vandalism & visigothism. Maybe not on the scale of the LA riots after the Rodney King beating, but that's possible too. Lots of smaller attacks could be just as damaging, only spread out.

 

[eye95]

There will be property damage. There will be violence. There will be folks attributing those actions to the racist judgment of the jury.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

 

[marshaul]

Gentlefolk, do you not find that characterizing the possible (probable?) riots after a Z. acquittal as a "chimp-out" is demeaning to us and to what we are supposed to stand for?

This old, white, very Southern man finds the use of such terms rather reprehensible and also feeding the stereotype the anti-gun types paint of us.

I fully expect riots and I just as fully expect to have to either defend myself and my property or abandon my property and flee to some area that affords more of a margin of safety. My prayer is that it does not come to either.

well said sir, thank you for echoing my sentiments.

Yes. Google "chimpout". Explicit racism is not only against the rules, it's against the spirit of this forum.

I'd ask the poster to self-moderate before somebody else does.






Incidentally, I'm too poor to make a wager, but I bet a few bits that there are no riots.

 

[skidmark]

How are we going to distinguish a riot from the 'normal' behaviour of gangs randomly attacking people on the street, gangs swarming a store to plunder & destroy, etc.?

....

Probably because they and the MSM will tell us it is a riot, as opposed to your everyday wilding.

BTW - I find your reference to visigothism to be culturally insensitive. Barbarians are people, too, you know. We have feelings. (Not many, but we have them.)

stay safe.

 

[WalkingWolf]

The best way out of this is for the prosecution to ask for a lesser charge of illegal parking. That way GZ will for sure be found guilty, and there will be no need for rioting. If not illegal parking then walking on the grass, or illegal trash dumping. Something the jury can sleep with of a night, and the race baiters can then claim victory.

 

[OC for ME]

There will be property damage. There will be violence. There will be folks attributing those actions to the racist judgment of the jury.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>

Is it not true that the jury is all women and some number are black women? I do not know. I heard references to the jury makeup on the radio. Anyway, if the jury makeup is all women with some black women and they acquit then the "race business" will toss their own under the bus. Liberalism is the true home of racism, liberals thrive on racial division. Liberals would have little if any power, or influence, without tossing out the race card at any opportunity.

Anyone/everyone is expendable to a liberal even another black liberal if it suits the ends of the liberal agenda.

 

[beebobby]

I wonder if the riots, if they occur, will be as disruptive as say, those occuring after major sporting events?
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/16/sports/la-sp-sports-riots-20110617

 

[WalkingWolf]

Is it not true that the jury is all women and some number are black women? I do not know. I heard references to the jury makeup on the radio. Anyway, if the jury makeup is all women with some black women and they acquit then the "race business" will toss their own under the bus. Liberalism is the true home of racism, liberals thrive on racial division. Liberals would have little if any power, or influence, without tossing out the race card at any opportunity.

Anyone/everyone is expendable to a liberal even another black liberal if it suits the ends of the liberal agenda.

Five white, and one Hispanic woman, no "African Americans". I think five are mothers.

 

[WalkingWolf]

I wonder if the riots, if they occur, will be as disruptive as say, those occuring after major sporting events?
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/16/sports/la-sp-sports-riots-20110617

Riots do not happen because of events, events are excuses for rioting. Decent people do not riot, it does not matter what the event is.

 

[1245A Defender]

Well,,,,,

Riots do not happen because of events, events are excuses for rioting. Decent people do not riot, it does not matter what the event is.

If!!! Zimmerman was Convicted,,, Would Whites,, or White/Hispanics,,, RIOT??? right,, they would not!

 

[eye95]

If!!! Zimmerman was Convicted,,, Would Whites,, or White/Hispanics,,, RIOT??? right,, they would not!

I would have phrased it this way: If Zimmerman is convicted, would those who think the conviction was a major miscarriage of justice riot? Right, they would not.

I don't think color has anything to do with this case except how it has been disingenuously injected by race-baiters.

 

[marshaul]

I don't think color has anything to do with this case except how it has been disingenuously injected by race-baiters.

Exactly.

Although eye95 may not agree with my assertion that there are race-baiters on both sides of the issue.

 

[KYKevin]

This pretty much says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UJFM59NfXw&feature=share&list=UUh_pjHONrnhzFbPv1Sg5EnA

Sorry no clue how to actually embed the video.

 

[minarchist]

Yes. Google "chimpout". Explicit racism is not only against the rules, it's against the spirit of this forum.

I'd ask the poster to self-moderate before somebody else does.






Incidentally, I'm too poor to make a wager, but I bet a few bits that there are no riots.

"Racism" is a construct invented by socialist scum who desperately wanted a disarmed populace.

Many leftists consider it racist for a non-black to merely defend his or her life against black violence. With this widespread definition of "racism", it is disingenuous for suggest that it is against the spirit of a pro-self defense forum to advocate politically incorrect, yet legitimate, self defense.

 

[WalkingWolf]

I do not agree that using shock words is acceptable in all formats, such as this one. But I to contend that a word is a word, it is the context of the word that defines the user.

Now excuse me while I eat my soup and "crackers". And there is nothing wrong with yellow rice, and "black" beans, with onions. Just so you know Cubans do not call them black beans they use that other word, even though many Cubans are black.

Kind of reminds me of a AA on another site that routinely calls white people racist, while using the term "honkies" and "injun". This idiot swears his is not a racist while cracking jokes about diseased blankets.

 

[marshaul]

"Racism" is a construct invented by socialist scum who desperately wanted a disarmed populace.

Many leftists consider it racist for a non-black to merely defend his or her life against black violence. With this widespread definition of "racism", it is disingenuous for suggest that it is against the spirit of a pro-self defense forum to advocate politically incorrect, yet legitimate, self defense.

Nice job demolishing that straw man.

 

[eye95]

"Racism" is a construct invented by socialist scum who desperately wanted a disarmed populace.

Many leftists consider it racist for a non-black to merely defend his or her life against black violence. With this widespread definition of "racism", it is disingenuous for suggest that it is against the spirit of a pro-self defense forum to advocate politically incorrect, yet legitimate, self defense.

Racism is real. That it is often is seen where it is not does not mean it does not exist.

Your original thread title was racist. Your having posted it was racist. Are you a racist? I don't know, but there is evidence out there that you are.

 

[Ca Patriot]

who cares if someone is racist. people are allowed to think and feel however they want.

 

[marshaul]

who cares if someone is racist. people are allowed to think and feel however they want.

The owners of this forum care if folks express that racism here.... That's good enough for me.

Personally, I don't give two bits what you believe in the privacy of your own head.

 

[minarchist]

Nice job demolishing that straw man.

You made reference to "racism", which is an ill-defined word that today generally means "any action taken againt politically protected groups, regardless of whether said action is justified." That is precisely why Zimmerman is enduring a show trial in the first place.