There is a difference between believing that a government should not do something and believing that it does not have the authority to do it.
I do not believe that government should license concealment. I believe (even though it does not have the authority to license carry) that it has the authority to license concealment.
If you are saying that even the local government cannot ever have the authority to license your dog, then you are a sovereign citizen. If you say that it can, but it shouldn't, then you are the same kind of liberal as the Framers (a conservative or a libertarian in today's terminology).
Sovereign citizens are just anarchists. They believe that government has no authority to do anything. The two might insist there are differences. Whatever differences there are are inconsequential. Both philosophies are pie-in-the-sky, unworkable idealism. Were we to achieve a level of lack of government that would even come close to making these folks happy, we'd have less Liberty than we have now, as bullying by individuals and gangs would become the norm. Good, honest folks would band together for their protection. One or two would take charge of the group, and most would readily accept this internal bullying for protection from the external bullying.
A government, properly structured, given authority by the People, is (ironically) the only way to preserve Liberty. The Framers hit upon the best model yet. It is because we have strayed from that model that we experience government taking authority it was not given.
The key features of that model:
1. Separation of powers horizontally.
2. Separation of powers vertically.
3. Power is granted vertically, from the bottom up.
4. Power is granted least at the top, most at the bottom.
Where we have gotten away from this model:
1. Power is collecting at the top.
2. Power is being granted vertically from the top down.
3. Power is no longer separated vertically (see #2).
4. Horizontal separations are being ignored.
The most key feature of the model was that government was republican. It is now democratic. To preserve a maximum of Liberty requires that we restore federalism and republicanism. It was an ingenious system, but it still required the vigilance of the People to preserve it: as Franklin so wisely informed that lady.