...I won't make the mistake again of posting a CC question here.
I'm not attacking the character of others posted here. I take exception with what Mark has to say about me. I will defend myself in any situation I am attacked!
Mark won a substantial court victory when he was prosecuted for OC, and he is a firm, pure believer in exercising the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.
BB62 wrote:No he didn't, he wussed out and took a little money and ran, and agreed to keep the amount secret. From his words on here, one would certainly expect him to have "accepted no compromise" and made no "deal with the devil." His battle cry was not "LET THEIR ACTIONS BE BROUGHT INTO THE LIGHT OF DAY IN OPEN COURT!! LET US STRENGTHEN THE CASE LAW ON THE BOOKS SHOWING LA PUNISHES CROOKS LIKE THIS!"Mark won a substantial court victory when he was prosecuted for OC, and he is a firm, pure believer in exercising the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.
His battle cry was "Oh, a little secret money? Good enough for me, that's what I wanted in the first place."
You and Dustin are some self-righteous, judgmental pieces of work. You are the anti-gunners' ally. It is kooks that give them the ammo they need to pass their bills. Both of y'all have come to me asking things, just like thousands of other LA gun owners...
Louisiana Carry wrote:BB62 wrote:No he didn't, he wussed out and took a little money and ran, and agreed to keep the amount secret. From his words on here, one would certainly expect him to have "accepted no compromise" and made no "deal with the devil." His battle cry was not "LET THEIR ACTIONS BE BROUGHT INTO THE LIGHT OF DAY IN OPEN COURT!! LET US STRENGTHEN THE CASE LAW ON THE BOOKS SHOWING LA PUNISHES CROOKS LIKE THIS!"Mark won a substantial court victory when he was prosecuted for OC, and he is a firm, pure believer in exercising the RIGHT to keep and bear arms.
His battle cry was "Oh, a little secret money? Good enough for me, that's what I wanted in the first place."
You and Dustin are some self-righteous, judgmental pieces of work. You are the anti-gunners' ally. It is kooks that give them the ammo they need to pass their bills. Both of y'all have come to me asking things, just like thousands of other LA gun owners...
Me? A Louisiana gun owner? I asked you for help? Not I!
btw - who's Dustin?
I appreciate it - but who's Dustin?By you, I was meaning Mark. I was expecting him to be the one reading my words at that point. Sorry for the confusion.
A guyin this thread who has taken up my time on the phone and on this board asking me about LA Law and then turns around and calls me an anti-gunner now that he has become Mark's little fan boy. Talk about a lack of respect.Louisiana Carry wrote:I appreciate it - but who's Dustin?By you, I was meaning Mark. I was expecting him to be the one reading my words at that point. Sorry for the confusion.
Ask him again and also ask him how complaints against drs. are handled in your state.My CHP is up for renewal in Louisiana. The state Police requires a medical form for anyone taking certain prescriptions. My doctor refuses to fill out this form because he says I need a different type of doctor to fill this paperwork out. He prescribes the medication, but won't fill out the paperwork. I have another doctor that might fill out the paperwork, but if she does not, my CHP will not be renewed. I have had my permit for 12 years. Also, my doctor says he feels no one should be carrying guns. I will be searching for a new doctor. Any suggestions.
Funny, b6 is actually showing clear thinking. MeM is the emotional one.b36rjm, Your getting way to emotional here. Your wording shows it. Instead of attacking and debating the issue at hand, your attacking our character.
The facts remain the same.
Permit/License to carry = Permission = Cost you $$$ to Express
OC =No Permission, No License, No Permit = Right FREEFULLY Expressed.
Now let's try again.
:uhoh:Are you serious ?Markand Dustin are some self-righteous, judgmental pieces of work
Funny, b6 is actually showing clear thinking. MeM is the emotional one.
Wrong again. Just like your boy just said, defending what I believe DOES NOT have anything to do with forcing you to do the same. That's just an attempt to escape the real issue of the topic.You and MeM are attempting to force you way of looking at it upon others.
Confrontation is not the only way to regain our many lost rights. It does appear to be your only way of attempting to do so. Your method is not for everyone, and the methods others employ is not for you. That does not equate to your way being the ONLY way. When you close your mind to the other methods of regaining our many lost rights, you deny the assistance of those who are not in lockstep with your thinking. Open your mind, and you will find more allies than you currently accept. Soften your communication, and more people will see you as an ally.Confrontation is the ONLY way to regain our many lost rights. Dictators and tyrants very rarely give up power voluntarily. The only thing they understand if a force greater than themselves.
When I first got out of the parish prison, my original intent was to drag these thugs, kicking and screaming if need be, into CRIMINAL court. I spent a HUGE amount of time and effort trying to make that happen. I left NO stone unturned in my pursuit. Don't take my word for it, call anyone entrusted with enforcing the criminal laws in Louisiana. ALL of them "wussed out" and refused to honor their oaths of office.
A CIVIL action was the only recourse left. After Ashton backed out ( a blessing in disguise) I found John Delgado. John made it abundantly clear: this matter would not go to trial, at least not with him involved. The ONLY offer he made was to negotiate an out-of-court settlement. Even then, he never even hinted at any non-disclosure clause. It wasn't until AFTER he negotiated a settlement the concept of a non-disclosure clause surfaced. There wasn't much left to do. Again, this wasn't my choice of options. It wasn't about money in the first place. If I had MY way, this matter would have been resolved in CRIMINAL court, no money involved.
The last thing anti-gunners want are informed, FREE men who not only KNOW their rights, but EXERCISE their rights. When I was being transported out of court one time, the guys transporting me back to confinement commented "Mark, they (government officials in court) are afraid of you. You know more about the law then they do." People who beg and scrape for permits, allow the state to run their lives, THOSE are people the anti's love.
:uhoh:Are you serious ?Markand Dustin are some self-righteous, judgmental pieces of work
I'm at a lost for words here. I'm simply trying to express my own belief's. EXACTLY the same thing you guys are doing everytime you reply. I'm defending what I believe, EXACLTY the same thingyour doing everytime you reply.If you think that's cramming it down your throat, then you got your own issue's.
I've simply (NICELY) stated my opinion. NOT ONCE, has ANYONE even attempted to explain the opposite. You guys just start the name calling ?
How about start with some logical discussion, and explain how paying for a permit to carry, is indeed helping the 2A.
That's all I'm asking. I'm seriously a little pissed that both of you have resulted to name calling. I stated that what I THOUGHT, as in IMHO, paying for permit was anti. Then you result to what you said ?
Your acting like kids that got caught and proved wrong, and so you result to ignorant name calling and deface of character until you find a way to weasel out of the conversation.
I still can't believe what you just said LA Carry. I'm stunned ....
Dustin wrote::uhoh:Are you serious ?Markand Dustin are some self-righteous, judgmental pieces of work
I'm at a lost for words here. I'm simply trying to express my own belief's. EXACTLY the same thing you guys are doing everytime you reply. I'm defending what I believe, EXACLTY the same thingyour doing everytime you reply.If you think that's cramming it down your throat, then you got your own issue's.
I've simply (NICELY) stated my opinion. NOT ONCE, has ANYONE even attempted to explain the opposite. You guys just start the name calling ?
How about start with some logical discussion, and explain how paying for a permit to carry, is indeed helping the 2A.
That's all I'm asking. I'm seriously a little pissed that both of you have resulted to name calling. I stated that what I THOUGHT, as in IMHO, paying for permit was anti. Then you result to what you said ?
Your acting like kids that got caught and proved wrong, and so you result to ignorant name calling and deface of character until you find a way to weasel out of the conversation.
I still can't believe what you just said LA Carry. I'm stunned ....
I certainly didn't like saying it. I like you. But you were not just stating your opinion, you were showing your butt. Rebut everything by calling it an ad hominem all you want, but I am surprised that you are surprised that I am pissed.
"This is why I say that by bowing down to the system, you are more of a proponent for the Anti's than for the Pro 2A guys."
I am as hardcore a 2A guy as you will meet. I don't believe in restrictions on felons, mentally ill, etc. from owning guns, I don't even believe in restrictions on people owning nukes. Most people would call me a total extremist. Then you are going to step up and say that because I am an adult with responsibilities (to my family first of all) and get a CHP to make sure that I can accomplish everything I need to accomplish to pay for my land and be a foster parent and go to college and everything else I need to do- while being able to defend myself- I am working for the anti-gunners?
It is not that I just can't wrap my mind around your point, it is that, like it or not, we do live in the real world. Someone true to a no compromise stance should go live on an uncharted island and eat mangoes if they really want to be righteous. Short of that, if you are in America, you either compromise or go to jail.
My position is that we learn what is right and work towards it, but to pretend that bucking the system on every little thingis really hurting anyone but ourself shows a lack of maturity.
If you are in America, you either compromise or go to jail.