imported post
[align=left][/align]Since stores and businesses, though open to and soliciting the public, are granted broad private-property rights to discriminate against armed citizens (a stance that would not be tolerated against any other group) why shouldn't they be required to provide safe, convenient storage for citizens' guns while on the premises?
Why should we have to bear the burden of their bias? Let them be the ones inconvenienced. Faced with this, they might adopt a more reasonable position.
It's good to stir the pot now and then.
[align=left][/align]Since stores and businesses, though open to and soliciting the public, are granted broad private-property rights to discriminate against armed citizens (a stance that would not be tolerated against any other group) why shouldn't they be required to provide safe, convenient storage for citizens' guns while on the premises?
Why should we have to bear the burden of their bias? Let them be the ones inconvenienced. Faced with this, they might adopt a more reasonable position.
It's good to stir the pot now and then.