TechnoWeenie
Regular Member
imported post
I've gone through both, both are comfortable, both have been proven in terms of reliability, now the hard part comes.....
I can get a NIB PT-92 with 17 Rd. mags for 400$, or I can get a NIB Glock for about 500$, OR a slightly used, but like new PT-92 for about 350$....
Right now I'm leaning towards a brand new PT-92, who's only real difference from the 92FS is the fact that the safety is on the frame, instead of the slide, and it has rails.....
Thoughts...?
As an idea, here's the difference between a 'real' beretta and the clone PT-92, keep in mind that it is indeed a clone, when Beretta sold shop, Taurus bought out the factory/equipment and started making their own...
The frame mounted safety really appeals to me, as does the rail, which knocks the 'real' 92 out of the contest...
So it's either the PT-92, or the Glock..... SOB!
I've gone through both, both are comfortable, both have been proven in terms of reliability, now the hard part comes.....
I can get a NIB PT-92 with 17 Rd. mags for 400$, or I can get a NIB Glock for about 500$, OR a slightly used, but like new PT-92 for about 350$....
Right now I'm leaning towards a brand new PT-92, who's only real difference from the 92FS is the fact that the safety is on the frame, instead of the slide, and it has rails.....
Thoughts...?
As an idea, here's the difference between a 'real' beretta and the clone PT-92, keep in mind that it is indeed a clone, when Beretta sold shop, Taurus bought out the factory/equipment and started making their own...
The frame mounted safety really appeals to me, as does the rail, which knocks the 'real' 92 out of the contest...
So it's either the PT-92, or the Glock..... SOB!