NHCGRPR45
Regular Member
see cat at left,,,,
What is disturbing is that Mr. Drinkwine is empowered to legislate and create Ordinances in the city of Royal Oak, but he seems not to understand legal definitions . . . legalities in question . . . [and seems the type to] interject emotions resulting in unlawful ordinances.
Michigan Law specifically preempts firearms and not explosives or other weapons.
"...a gun goes BOOM, that's an explosive...!"
I agree, after watching the council videos and observing him in person. Fortunately, the state eventually recognizes the threat to fundamental rights posed by guys like Drinkwine, and they find themselves preempted.
If local government wishes to look for the reason the state seems deaf a lot of times with their requests to gain back "local control" on a preempted area, they need only look into the mirror.
http://www.ci.royal-oak.mi.us/porta...meetings/City Commission/2011/0103-004-11.pdf
My take: Changes are in line with MCL 123.1102 and MCL 10.31.
Your take?
technically he is right, a small controlled explosion is what propells the projectile from the barrel, and actually there are 2 explosions the firing pins ignites the primer which in turn ignites the powder charge, which then sends the bullet down the barrel. so just this once the stars have aligned, and the planets have fallen into sync and mr. drinkwine has pulled out the right answer without really ever understanding the question.
:banana:
Using that oversimplistic definition, the 10,000+ internal combustion engines within the city limits, including but not limited to, cars, motorcycles, lawn mowers, weed whippers, chain saws ect, ect...are all explosives.
Don't forget the sonic boom. Good things come in 3's primer powder air
Using that oversimplistic definition, the 10,000+ internal combustion engines within the city limits, including but not limited to, cars, motorcycles, lawn mowers, weed whippers, chain saws ect, ect...are all explosives.
How about Drinkwine's mouth when his limited nuerons rub together...could that be considered a dangerous explosive?
Originally Posted by MCL 29.42WHAT HE ^ SAID! Good one!
How about Drinkwine's mouth when his limited nuerons rub together...could that be considered a dangerous explosive?
Harry25 and I were at the meeting, we both spoke on the Civil Emergencies Ordinance Changes. Kudos to the Royal Oak City Commissioners for voting to send this back for re-work (they only wanted to pass an ordinance that would be in agreement with State Law). The City Attorney admitted that this was part of End-Of-Year cleanup and that he missed the parts we mentioned.
Harry25 is a great guy, it was good to meet him.
On a side note, Commissioner Drinkwine was his usual animated self. I find it ironic that he is the Chairperson for the Royal Oak Liquor Control Committee...
Hey, look at the picture (top right) of ol' Drinkwine OCING... what a hypocrite!
http://terrydrinkwineoutdoors.com/?cat=7
I just listened to drinkwines speech on explosives and ammunition and how dare mere mortal civilians should not be allowed to acquire the tools necessary to defend themselves during a time of emergency.
Someone needs to "autotune" his speech. I am on my iPhone today.