Because his three braches lick the unions ass, who also work on the polling machines!Once again Schumer doesn't need any help proving his stupidity! How does this clown keep getting elected?:cuss:
Last edited:
Because his three braches lick the unions ass, who also work on the polling machines!Once again Schumer doesn't need any help proving his stupidity! How does this clown keep getting elected?:cuss:
I thought the three branches were Curly, Moe & Larry.
Are you calling a US Senator a liar? Shame on you.
Anyone who knows anything about concussion grenades knows that they dont have the ability to injure or kill anyone, and that they are relatively harmless.
Both concussion grenades, and stun grenades (which I believe you were intending to refer to), are capable of causing injury, although it would require extreme proximity to the blast. Not to mention that flashbangs occasionally set houses on fire, which can be quite lethal.
And both of them are pretty much guaranteed to cause hearing damage (without protection), which is a underrated form of injury (I know it's cool for many who have destroyed their hearing, but I will not take kindly to any person who assaults and causes permanent damage to one of the five senses in the only body I have).
I mention this because of an incident where a cop threw a flashbang under some bleachers occupied by a bunch of kids, if I recall as some sort of demo of "how cool we are".
Generally, the incident drew the cop apologists out of the woodwork, most of whom argued that hearing loss doesn't count as an injury, and anybody who didn't think it was totally awesome to have a cop damage their hearing by setting off a flashbang, deserves hearing loss anyway for not appreciating how awesome it is for cops to flashbang kids, because, hey, flashbangs are "non-lethal".
I know it's off-topic, but I just felt like saying: it isn't cool to flashbang innocent people. I value my hearing much more than most folks seem to, and I'd ask for a little respect for that. I seek to reject assertions that flashbangs are an appropriate law enforcement tool for scenarios which have not yet developed as calling for escalated force.
I have to question who is the dumber person, Schumer or the person(s) who vote for him.
This ranks right up there with the congressman who was afraid the island would have too many people and "tip over."
Our tax dollars at work, and our bad for voting blithering idiots into office.
I wasnt saying that Flash bangs are harmless. I know they can Injure. I was saying that I heard Charles Schumer say that they couldn't injure anyone. I was pointing out how absurd his statements are some times.
He made the comments during the Senate hearings on Waco.
The way you quoted my post, it looks like you are kind of putting his words in my mouth.
hmmm, the three branches of government?;
the good, the bad, the ugly?