JerryD
Regular Member
my signature says it all
The masses may not have the experience many of you have. And, except for the cost considerations, who in their right mind would argue against at least some form of firearms safety training? (Keep in mind that if you get what you want, your neighbor can and may legally purchase a handgun and cause a negligent discharge into you home killing your wife or child because he/she doesn't have a clue concerning the proper knowledge, skills, and attitude necessary to safely own and operate a firearm.)
my signature says it all
What is the deal here guys/gals? Spartucus leaks "inside' information
What is the deal here guys/gals? Spartucus leaks "inside' information then Doug rubber stamps it, and most join in as if to already concede! This is straight out of a legal battle play book, first make your opponent believe they will lose in court then settle in the hallway before you go in front of the judge, enter and have the judge sign the agreement. I am not going to roll over on my convictions of what my rights are even if I have to continue open carrying rather than go to a mandated training and pay a fee to get a cc permit. Stand hard and strong, yes get the names so we can be a part of the process, and there is another election coming right up, the clock is already ticking.
Pretty much. We may end up with a permit system anyway, but the way some are cheering it on is disgusting. That's what happens when you live too close to the state that put Jessie Ventura and Al Franken in office. The goofiness is contagious.
While this may seem logical to you, the operation of it is different. Specifically, we have the "in home" for Nevada, and it is NOT referred to as Castle Doctrine. Places where they DO have "stand your ground where you are" get referred to as Castle Doctrine. It seems counter-intuitive.
[url said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_we%27ve_got_here_is_%28a%29_failure_to_communicate]Usage[/url]
In contemporary usage the line is usually an illustrative mockery of the principle behind it; the allocation of blame or fault for refusal to agree with or accept a powerful nemesis.
People, the time to make noise on the repeal is now. I have already contacted my legislators, and others like Gunderson. They can't read minds, so we need to let them know what we want. If we don't contact them, we are GUARANTEED to get a shall issue bill with mandatory training and fees.
If you post here in support of the CCW repeal, then you better contact your legislators. Otherwise you really aren't helping the cause. People who are afraid to speak to the right folks aren't really the patriots they think they are.
While this may seem logical to you, the operation of it is different. Specifically, we have the "in home" for Nevada, and it is NOT referred to as Castle Doctrine. Places where they DO have "stand your ground where you are" get referred to as Castle Doctrine. It seems counter-intuitive.