Non-sequitur. That statement is also specious.
Your post still advocates using the courts to hassle potentially innocent citizens. Such a position shows no respect for Liberty. It remains disappointing that we have folks here posting such advocacy.
If that is the sum total of what you have to contribute, I'll just move on to more fruitful discussions with others.
You enter the conversation with rather heartless remark of "One less idiot." I try to think of ways to stop bad behavior before it happens, or at least encourage people to not break the traffic laws.
I don't know about Alabama, but there are states where traffic cameras DO count against people who speed. Just try flying down the Illinois toll roads sometime, and then watch your mail box.
Do I like it? Not necessarily, but in the absence of having a traffic cop every half mile, I guess it will do.
I thought the point here was the incident we started talking about was the motorcyclist who ran into a police car, and what might have been done to avoid such an incident. Scratch that, I actually don't know what the original point was. Perhaps it was just a "WOW, look what happened the other night." MY POINT is there are ways to discourage such behavior. If you don't like mine, come up with some of your own.
As far as driving being a privilege versus a right, you need a license to drive, privilege.
In most states, you need a license/permit to conceal carry, privilege.
In most states, you do not need a license to open carry, right.
On the day I can legally drive down the highway and not need a license, then it will be a right. But I'll probably be dead before that happens.
Moving on.
(kidding)
