Today and tomorrow and the following day. Would you like us to take donations for a one way plane ticket to one of those countries? While I don't think Trump was the answer he was the best of what we were given to choose from. Let's all hope he does the right thing for the nation.Today Muslims, tomorrow may be you or me or US...
DJT fear or hatred of Muslims is similar to the Antis fear of weapons or their hatred towards folks exercising their individual rights..
His violation of the Constitutions 1st amendment, 5th Amendment and 14th Amendment is a prelim to the tyranny..
American's must ask themselves, Am I proud to be an America today?.. I must confess, I AM NOT!
When the leader of the so-called free world violates Natural Rights without any regards to the consequences thereof, we all lose.
My only solace is that I did not vote for this tyranny...
Are you proud to be an American today??..
My .02
I think it will take up to one yr to really know.He already has. PRESIDENT Trump has met my expectations. Any troubles from here on out into the future are caused by and the fault of disloyal troublemakers and are not on him.
Now if we can get McCain to quit whining.He already has. PRESIDENT Trump has met my expectations. Any troubles from here on out into the future are caused by and the fault of disloyal troublemakers and are not on him.
Canada's PM reiterates his open invitations to the refugees
this evening...
Five people were killed after gunmen opened fire in a Quebec City mosque during evening prayers, the mosque's president told reporters on Sunday.
A witness told Reuters that up to three gunmen fired on about 40 people inside the Quebec City Islamic Cultural Centre.
ipse
added: and they tightly control firearms...
Yes, it's rather like trying to point out to Trump supporters that the EO illegally ordered rejection of legal permanent residents. Over the objection of DHS, Bannon forced it through, with the order finally reaching points of entry at 3 a.m. Saturday, effective immediately, causing mass confusion.
snippp...
There's a consistent misuse of the constitution and "rights" in this thread. Every person in the world has the same rights. They don't flow from any government document. The constitution is a limitation upon government, not a list of permissions given to people. The constitution limits the government no matter where it acts, or against whom.
snippppp...
There's a consistent misuse of the constitution and "rights" in this thread. Every person in the world has the same rights. They don't flow from any government document. The constitution is a limitation upon government, not a list of permissions given to people. The constitution limits the government
Seriously? If you are not a US citizen, YOU HAVE NO US "RIGHTS!" You're ILLEGAL!! Not "undocumented". No voter rights. No social security card. No drivers license. No food stamps. No public education or birth control. No right to protest or demand a new president. You're ILLEGAL!!!! This really isn't that hard of a concept, not sure why so many Libs can't grasp it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, a permanent US Resident (green card holder) who is NOT a US Citizen has no rights? Just where in the US Constitution or Bill of RIGHTS does it say or imply one must be a citizen to have the protections provided or guaranteed by these documents?
Please note: The preceding is a specific request for a cite from you to support your claim of law.
So, a permanent US Resident (green card holder) who is NOT a US Citizen but is within the US has no rights? Just where in the US Constitution or Bill of RIGHTS does it say or imply one must be a citizen to have the protections provided or guaranteed by these documents?
Please note: The preceding is a specific request for a cite from you to support your claim of law.
suggestion joe, might check out post 15 as it contains the 1896 cite per se, if the individual is in the US territory.
outside, green card, visa, eh ~ outta luck!
ipse
oh might catch up on post 18 also
They are not citizens of the USA they have no rights to enter no matter where they are from.
Now if he tried stopping legal citizens from enter there would be a problem.
Foreign nationals have no right to be here vistas can be Revoked.
They are here at the government's whim.
They are not citizens of the USA they have no rights to enter no matter where they are from.
Now if he tried stopping legal citizens from enter there would be a problem.
Foreign nationals have no right to be here vistas can be Revoked.
They are here at the government's whim.
hammer, that is the distinction, after being kindly corrected, i made in post 15, as cited in the 1896 decision..protection is afforded only on our soil!
the few, and i mean few, out of the total number of daily influx of individuals entering this country affected by this EO, is statistically insignificant!
so why is the response completely out of proportion ?
sorry, something is going on and is totally amiss ~ huge uncharacteristic demonstrations by citizens in this country, candidly could care less about others protesting in other world venues, over a myriad on who gives a crap issues?
can someone provide a viable explaination why this phenomenon is occuring?
if you notice, nobody is mentioning this phenomenon as being uncharacteristic or questioning nor normalizing the situation with facts ~ is it like a lynch party running a muck, ranting and raging, seeking their brand of justice, on an innocent situation.
wondering out loud, the situation is almost like the country, as a whole, is being played, setup if you will, for....
remember i'm thinking aloud...
ipse
are you saying he can ban green card holders?
but also- you're correct. i think the biggest reason for my outcry against it isn't anything to do with trump (or obama), but the fact that people blindly support things they aren't aware are illegal or unconstitutional.
just because a majority of americans like or approve something, doesn't mean it's right.