We-the-People
Regular Member
Then it violates Oregon law and is void per ORS 166.170(2)
And the way the black letter law is written, the ENTIRE ordinance is void. Per ORS 166.170:
"166.170 State preemption. (1) Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly.
(2) Except as expressly authorized by state statute, no county, city or other municipal corporation or district may enact civil or criminal ordinances, including but not limited to zoning ordinances, to regulate, restrict or prohibit the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition. Ordinances that are contrary to this subsection are void."
Hence, per black letter law, it's not just the part about CHL holders not being exempted but the whole ordinance. i.e. per the law, anyone can carry in their parks. Of course our California infiltrated (i.e. liberal idiot) courts pretty much decide how they want anyway.
Remember, the INSIDE of your car is a "public place" according to the idiots sitting on the bench.