Well... sort of...
In the case of motor vehicle regs, they've been pressed on us over a great length of time with each generation acquiescing a bit more. There was never much push back because it was/is more convenient to pay the fine than to take the time and expense to fight.
Indeed there is a correct way to maintain our right to travel in any property of our choosing, but that requires significant resources. Most certainly if you decide to fight traffic law with bs conspiracy theories like "contract" etc, you WILL have the Glock pointed in your face.
What is most important in discussions like this is learn how the ugly monster called "administrative law" came about. Remember, per the several constitutions, only the legislative branch can... well... legislate. Administrative law, which came about shortly after the civil war, has been the executive branch's way around this. By allowing the heads of these legislatively created agencies to promulgate rules, the executive branch has gained great power to do its own legislating. The fed and state administrative procedures acts were adopted due to requirements from the courts because of "due process" and "separation of powers" issues, but in many cases, the fed or states ignore the proper application of the their respective apa's and there is the "trick". If you complicate the trick enough and make compliance easy enough, you don't need to point the Glock except in very limited circumstances.