zaitz
Banned
If a law is truly open to interpretation, then the law might as well be divined with Taro cards each morning. ed.
what is the latest on this, if anything?
thanks for drawing fire, if that was your intent!
If a law is truly open to interpretation, then the law might as well be divined with Taro cards each morning. ed.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.100.010The Washington State Convention Center is operated by a Public Facilities District, so RCW 9.41.300 does not apply, as according to legal sources the arena/convention center has to be operated by the municipality, not a public/private non-governmental entity. Though depending on if the arena/convention center is owned by the municipality, there could be cause for a court case if anyone wants to be a guinea pig (minus all cases currently heard).
Was found guilty of criminal trespass.
The judge skewed the law, I was told that because I am a lawyer that I cannot understand the law, according to the persecutor's closing statement I unlawfully entered the convention center on November 8th 2014, the officer (acting sgt) on the stand claimed that HE did not arrest but rather order his underlings to do so, one of his underlings testified, today, (with a video showing) that the SGT who testified yesterday did in-fact, personally, arrest me, etc.
The judge would not allow the full trespassing law that I was being charged with to be part of jury instructions and including all the elements listed for conviction.
The judge added words to the law that are not any where to be found, see previous post.
The judge also denied most of the objections raised by my defense attorney and up help most of the persecutor's objections.
According to a member of the audience, the judge told the jury to find me guilty in not so much as those direct words but by changing the law, not allowing the law as written to go back with the jurors, denying most of the objections raised by my defense counsel, etc.
The audience member had not studied law but said it looked like a RR job.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.100.010
(3) A public facilities district is a municipal corporation, an independent taxing "authority" within the meaning of Article VII, section 1 of the state Constitution, and a "taxing district" within the meaning of Article VII, section 2 of the state Constitution.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/municipalities
municipality (redirected from municipalities)
Also found in: Legal, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
mu·nic·i·pal·i·ty (myo͞o-nĭs′ə-păl′ĭ-tē)
n. pl. mu·nic·i·pal·i·ties
1. A political unit, such as a city, town, or village, incorporated for local self-government.
2. A body of officials appointed to manage the affairs of a local political unit.
It is a municipality and so 9.41.300 does apply.
(2) Cities, towns, counties, and other municipalities may enact laws and ordinances:
(b) Restricting the possession of firearms in any stadium or convention center, operated by a city, town, county, or other municipality, except that such restrictions shall not apply to:
(i) Any pistol in the possession of a person licensed under RCW 9.41.070 or exempt from the licensing requirement by RCW 9.41.060; or
What part of "shall not apply to" do you fail to understand?However the case if a person OCs into an arena/convention center which is covered under RCW 9.41.300, then they would have to show their CPL to maintain possession of sidearm/allowed admittance (though they may be asked to CC the firearm).
Been appealed, conviction has been repealed.Can you confirm that you will be appealing (sounds like you have several grounds to do so), or at least reviewing your options?
Any penalty for the SGT lying under oath?
Just curious... what was your sentencing / fine?
The judges logic is laughable.
New pretrial is set for 01FEB2016
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
Basically, the lower court has to follow the rules, this time. I may have to go through the whole trial process again.Does that mean you are starting over from scratch ?
~Whitney
New pretrial is set for 01FEB2016
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
Will send you a PM with the case number, that way you can access all records that are publicly available.If i'm still in the city, i'll try to attend. This is unbelievable. All this because you were told a blatant lie, ending in corrupt courts talking utter horse manure. Now what are the rules as far as media? I would love to get audio of the judges corruption, manipulation and lies. I will then proceed to do up an article on it and expose this as much as possible.
Please tell me how to do this without causing you further harassment and persecution. I am well aware there are issues with ongoing court cases and I don't want to jeopardise your chances of winning
Following this sickening travesty of "justice" with interest.Will send you a PM with the case number, that way you can access all records that are publicly available. ...
I simply post updates. That way there is a thread to follow.Following this sickening travesty of "justice" with interest.
You may want to consider editing your initial post and noting the current status of things.
Trust me, I know all about them trying to make it a trespass case not a gun case. They cannot win the gun case. I have been there and done that......I simply post updates. That way there is a thread to follow.
Another member found a very pro-freedom attorney's office and I am still waiting for the contact information of that office. I want to see if they would take my case against Seattle depending on how all of this pans out.
The superior court ruled that since I have a CPL that the convention center could not restrict my method of carry. That the lower court was wrong when it told the jurors otherwise. Despite this it would appear that the Judge on Friday could not have been bothered to even read the remand ruling and throw the case out then and there. When my public defender moved to have the case dismissed in light of this, he said that this is not a gun charge but a trespassing charge. So, either way, this last judge is lazy, an idiot, and/or corrupt. No matter how it is, I see him as unfit to be seated in any public office.
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
Understood, but you could do both.I simply post updates. That way there is a thread to follow. ...
If I back edit the story, then it would look like I am changing the recorded story. Unless you're suggesting that I simply tack on to the tail of the initial posting?Understood, but you could do both.
Either that or just list the current state of things there, in addition to posting them as things occurred. My suggestions were made in order to possibly help/give the matter broader understanding and visibility.If I back edit the story, then it would look like I am changing the recorded story. Unless you're suggesting that I simply tack on to the tail of the initial posting?
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk