0V3RC10CK3D
Regular Member
imported post
I'm going to go watch the Boondock Saints, I love that movie.
I'm going to go watch the Boondock Saints, I love that movie.
I am not going to say I will never help someone in need, I would and will if they need help, in situations where the risk < reward.
But again, it is risk versus reward. Why am I going to risk my life to save someone else from being severely hurt or killed? And don't get me started on morals. If you are not alive to be called a "hero," then there was absolutely NO reward. Especially if you leave behind your own family.
I am armed to protect myself, friends and family. A person as young as her can be prepared to defend themselves. They can run, carry and use OC spray, or have knowledge of defensive fighting tactics.
I believe in what Charles Darwin is famous for. Survival of the fittest, or the people best prepared, will survive.
Sigh. According to the articles on this story, she did leave, ASKED for police escort, DID use pepper spray on one person (remember there wasa group of 10 or so) and she did try to get help from the guards.I am not going to say I will never help someone in need, I would and will if they need help, in situations where the risk < reward.
But again, it is risk versus reward. Why am I going to risk my life to save someone else from being severely hurt or killed? And don't get me started on morals. If you are not alive to be called a "hero," then there was absolutely NO reward. Especially if you leave behind your own family.
I am armed to protect myself, friends and family. A person as young as her can be prepared to defend themselves. They can run, carry and use OC spray, or have knowledge of defensive fighting tactics.
I believe in what Charles Darwin is famous for. Survival of the fittest, or the people best prepared, will survive.
"**** this, I quit" -> jump in and defend the person who is inches away from being ******* murdered by a pissant bitch of a teenager who never learned the first part of being a decent ******* human being.I'm currently a licensed unarmed Security Officer. While looking for a job I asked questions of the guards in the tunnel. Their pay is a few dollars less than mine, being just a little over minimum wage. Professionally speaking, they don't get paid enough to take the risk. Also professionally speaking, their contract specifically forbids them from interfering.
What you're doing is Monday Morning Quarterbacking in a field in which you aren't trained or employed. Sure, on a purely human level, they should have jumped in, but it seems to me I read somewhere that they were outnumbered just about 3 to 1. Sorry that I can't cite, but I'll try to find it again.
Also, weren't at least MOST of the people involved underage? If the S.O.s had so much as touched one of these little savages they could have gone to jail.
Believe me, the questions are being asked. This was a gigantic fail on the part of Metro. If they want real security in the tunnels they need to come off some Benjamins and get armed security in there.
I also ask myself why none of the bystanders got involved either. That's as much of a crime in my book as what thr guards weren't allowed to do.
+1"@#$% this, I quit" -> jump in and defend the person who is inches away from being @#$%ing murdered by a pissant bitch of a teenager who never learned the first part of being a decent @#$%ing human being.
Tawnos wrote:+1"@#$% this, I quit" -> jump in and defend the person who is inches away from being @#$%ing murdered by a ing human being.
You can always get another job, but you can't grant another life.
I think you have mistaken reward as monetary value.swatspyder wrote:Sigh. According to the articles on this story, she did leave, ASKED for police escort, DID use pepper spray on one person (remember there wasa group of 10 or so) and she did try to get help from the guards.I am not going to say I will never help someone in need, I would and will if they need help, in situations where the risk < reward.
But again, it is risk versus reward. Why am I going to risk my life to save someone else from being severely hurt or killed? And don't get me started on morals. If you are not alive to be called a "hero," then there was absolutely NO reward. Especially if you leave behind your own family.
I am armed to protect myself, friends and family. A person as young as her can be prepared to defend themselves. They can run, carry and use OC spray, or have knowledge of defensive fighting tactics.
I believe in what Charles Darwin is famous for. Survival of the fittest, or the people best prepared, will survive.
Risk< Reward? Holy snapizzle you are A PUSSY.
Are you one of those guys that will ONLY take on a dude if you know you got it in the bag? Only do things when you know there is no risk to you? What A PUSSY.
Do stuff for the reward. Pffft.
I've done many things at my grandma's elderly apartment buildings, such as seeing people very old people trying to carry heavy stuff on the elevators and assisting, heck, I even carried it all way into elderly stranger's apartments and set it down for them WITHOUT expecting crap in return. And I would be back on my way on the elevator with no more thought of it. Even in the street, doing random acts of kindness without ever expecting a reward. It is nice to get a reward, but don't expect one. I haven't been in a situation where someone was beat, but I have been in situations where I did step up for someone and most likely prevent shizz from happening and have had the same happen for me, and I was very thankful.
You want that hero title? Sorry, you get the PUSSY title.
Edited to add:
And I apologize if I sound harsh, but this event really pissed me off, knowing this damn well could have been anyone else, and that all those pussies in the video, didn't do shizz but just stand gawk like morons. :banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
It's funny how you carry a gun on your side.I think you have mistaken reward as monetary value.
Risk versus reward, you weigh each side. Reward being "good", risk being "bad."
This is the reason why the second amendment is worded how it is. EVERYONE should be able to protect themselves with a firearm. It doesn't matter what age or gender or race or skill level. I DO NOT have training and LEGAL backing, to protect another citizen. Police are pretty much guaranteed that even when they screw up, they are mostly protected. That happens to me, you can pretty much bet that I will be thousands in debt trying to fight civil lawsuits against me.swatspyder wrote:It's funny how you carry a gun on your side.I think you have mistaken reward as monetary value.
Risk versus reward, you weigh each side. Reward being "good", risk being "bad."
And one of the reasons for carrying a gun is because...when seconds matter...police are minutes away, correct?
You said you would only call 911, what good would that do?
It doesn't take long to smash a human beings skull in.
How would you have walked off from that?
"She's not family, or a friend, so it doesn't matter that I watched her get stomped on and didn't try to stop it"
What good does this do to let the public know, that gun owners yak about protecting ourselves by arming ourselves all day, but won't go out of their way to help someone in need? You're just as bad as the anti's who want to disarm The People.
I am sure, after a judge watches the video of that girl getting her head smashed in, and you coming in to help her, you will not be the bad guy there.This is the reason why the second amendment is worded how it is. EVERYONE should be able to protect themselves with a firearm. It doesn't matter what age or gender or race or skill level. I DO NOT have training and LEGAL backing, to protect another citizen. Police are pretty much guaranteed that even when they screw up, they are mostly protected. That happens to me, you can pretty much bet that I will be thousands in debt trying to fight civil lawsuits against me.
I'll give a +1 to Swat for that.Poosharker wrote:This is the reason why the second amendment is worded how it is. EVERYONE should be able to protect themselves with a firearm. It doesn't matter what age or gender or race or skill level. I DO NOT have training and LEGAL backing, to protect another citizen. Police are pretty much guaranteed that even when they screw up, they are mostly protected. That happens to me, you can pretty much bet that I will be thousands in debt trying to fight civil lawsuits against me.swatspyder wrote:
Your comments in several posts illustrate that you are an example of why our society is going down the toilet. Too many "males" these days don't have what it takes to be a "man" -- this country was founded on men who stood up for what is right and fair, no matter the possible personal consequences. The community took care of itself, watched over its own, called the police to make the official arrest. THAT is why there is still citizens arrest in 49 states -- because we have a long-recognized moral duty as men to step in and protect children, women, and the defenseless.I am not going to say I will never help someone in need, I would and will if they need help, in situations where the risk < reward.
But again, it is risk versus reward. Why am I going to risk my life to save someone else from being severely hurt or killed? And don't get me started on morals. If you are not alive to be called a "hero," then there was absolutely NO reward. Especially if you leave behind your own family.
I am armed to protect myself, friends and family. A person as young as her can be prepared to defend themselves. They can run, carry and use OC spray, or have knowledge of defensive fighting tactics.
I believe in what Charles Darwin is famous for. Survival of the fittest, or the people best prepared, will survive.