oldbanger
Regular Member
[video=youtube_share;7SAmMZCL6ZE]http://youtu.be/7SAmMZCL6ZE[/video]
How come he ain't clinging to his gun that is openly displayed on his hip? He is in Carnegie, PA. Does he need a permission slip to OC in Carnegie, PA?
Is he a FUDD?
How come he ain't clinging to his gun that is openly displayed on his hip? He is in Carnegie, PA. Does he need a permission slip to OC in Carnegie, PA?
Is he a FUDD?
Good politics to be sure.(paragraph seven and eight) <snip> And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
Obama made a problematic judgment call in trying to explain working class culture to a much wealthier audience. He described blue collar Pennsylvanians with a series of what in the eyes of Californians might be considered pure negatives: guns, clinging to religion, antipathy, xenophobia. <snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-no-surprise-that-ha_b_96188.html
So what rating does Mitt "I support AWB and handgun registration" Romney have?He also has A ratings from both the NRA and GOA.
So what rating does Mitt "I support AWB and handgun registration" Romney have?
He also brought up "Joe , I didn't build that,the Plumber" in the same speech. Talk about pandering.
To be fair he is a life-long hunter and life time NRA member
To be fair he is a life-long hunter and life time NRA member
Pretty sure he's talking about Romney and mocking the other people overlooking Romney's record because his name isn't Obama.So what's he going to do when Romney gets ready to sign a national assault rifle ban? Shoot him hisself?
Good question!Interesting thought...I wonder how high the correlation is between lifetime members (especially with politicians) and the "A" ratings the NRA gives?
A political regurgitation of rhetoric that sent President Obama to the White House with 10,000,000 more votes than McCain. I wish they wouldn't waste their time with rehashing crapola that won't work.
Ryan will give Romney a tiny boost, but overall, Ryan will end-up being a drag on Romney's already sinking ship.
I dig that Ryan is a hunter though. I don;t dig his political hackery.
Good stuff! Let's hope he sticks to those guns if elected.
I guess what I don't understand, Beretta, is how you can correctly call Ryan's actions political hackery, yet not see the same in Obama.
He's packed his administration with big bankers--fourteen at last count if I recall. He's cozied up to corporations. He'd sell your rights to the first lobbyist to make a donation to the Democrat campaign. Ditto for the Republicrats.
No matter which party has been in power in the last 45 years (and neither party is ever genuinely out of power), deficit spending goes up--empowering the bankers by taking loans to finance the deficit spending, regulations multiply, and freedom shrinks.
So you agree that no matter who you vote for, the country is going to continue down it's path of degradation, but refuse to vote for the candidates that'll actually try to improve things because it's a waste of gas and time?Great, we agree, and you ask me why I am voting for one over the other?: I am being Practical here, knowing that a Principle vote is a waste of the gas it takes to get to the voting booth.
So you agree that no matter who you vote for, the country is going to continue down it's path of degradation, but refuse to vote for the candidates that'll actually try to improve things because it's a waste of gas and time?
So then why bother voting at all?
I feel that you all express enough of your opinions about President Obama; no sense in me adding to it.
He's done many things I don't agree with. As I have stated before, on a number of occasions: Different side of the same coin.--the question is: Which side do you want to look at the next four years?
Let me see here: The anit-Gay, anti-abortion candidate who's got a slash everything budget in mind--that is, except for military spending, which he wants to increase; or the soft anti-gay, anti-firearm, uber-pragmatist, who sold-out the Public Option. Hell, I'll take four more years of President Obama, than eight years of Romney. Do all the wishful thinking you like over the next four years, regarding possibly getting Romney out of office in 2016 with a 'better' candidate, it ain't going to happen, so, Romney is voted in, he is there for eight years.
Great, we agree, and you ask me why I am voting for one over the other?: I am being Practical here, knowing that a Principle vote is a waste of the gas it takes to get to the voting booth.
BTW, Freedom has gone no-place. Freedom is a BS notion. Freedom will never be Ideal, Freedom will never be Absolute.