tdcman1
New member
Whole Foods in Baton Rouge now has " No Firearms" signs at both entrances FWIW
The moment the officer decided to step outside the boundaries of law he became a criminal.
WHO saw WHAT?All of this was gathered via chat with our local ......
He did say that he has seen it happen to a few.
Gun taken from a holder and used in a crime resulted in the carrier being held liable in a civil lawsuit .
I do not see it written into law, thus left to the judge to decide.
Sorry was advised to not start mentioning people .
Anyways this was all via a chat with some persons who should know more then others.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws...
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
lulz.
This post is so bad it has to be from one of our members, kind of a sarcastic joke.
Either that or it's Boswer himself.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. First of all, he is correct about open carry laws. Private establishments have the right to set their own policy and it is your duty as the consumer to know what their policy is. They do not need to have a sign posted for firearms to be forbidden. That is a fact. As it was your duty to know the store's policy, the Officer, working a paid detail, was acting under color of law which allowed him to detain you and determine your intent. If you really think excessive force was used then I guess you should give up carrying a gun. Officers are not trained to walk up to an armed subject and say pretty please come with me. You had the potential to execute a deadly force assault thus the Officer was justified in taking restraining action to stop the threat. All your video proved is the Officer handled himself professionally and within the authority of his position, backed up by the store manager I might add. Good luck filing a frivilous lawsuit in either Civil District Court or in the Eastern District of LA. I for one am not fond of paying lawyers who routinely represent criminals against the government. It's usually better to be part of the solution than part of the problem.
I think it is Bowser himself. Take a look at his handle: gauxtgrs
It's pronounced in French "Go Tigers". The Holy Cross High School in New Orleans call their team the "Tigers". If it is him, he's a cowardly little **** isn't he?
Bowser or a BPD officer.I laugh at everyone who's jumping all over the Officer for doing his job. <snip>
I think it is Bowser himself. Take a look at his handle: gauxtgrs