PrayingForWar
Founder's Club Member
Could 'Goldilocks' planet be just right for life?
FULL STORY:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_sc/us_sci_new_earths
SNIP:
Can anyone else see the BLITHERING STUPIDITY of this statement? There MAY be water, and that means "that chances for life on this planet are 100 percent"...
These people are scientists??? You mean all I needed to become rich and get government grants was sit behind a telescope and make preposterous statements? Maybe we should be giving all this "scientific grant" (welfare) money to poor people instead. What harm could it do? At least nobody would give the nonsensical ravings of a bunch of ghetto dwellers any credibility.
It's idiocy like this that helps reconfirm my belief that Man Made Global Warming is a collosal SCAM.
FULL STORY:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_sc/us_sci_new_earths
SNIP:
"It's unknown whether water actually exists on the planet, and what kind of atmosphere it has. But because conditions are ideal for liquid water, and because there always seems to be life on Earth where there is water, Vogt believes "that chances for life on this planet are 100 percent."
Can anyone else see the BLITHERING STUPIDITY of this statement? There MAY be water, and that means "that chances for life on this planet are 100 percent"...
These people are scientists??? You mean all I needed to become rich and get government grants was sit behind a telescope and make preposterous statements? Maybe we should be giving all this "scientific grant" (welfare) money to poor people instead. What harm could it do? At least nobody would give the nonsensical ravings of a bunch of ghetto dwellers any credibility.
It's idiocy like this that helps reconfirm my belief that Man Made Global Warming is a collosal SCAM.
Last edited: