imported post
Pace wrote:
Yes, more power to him. I'm pretty sure that he's spouting what he heard elsewhere, but its a little more innovative than most people. That being said, its a bit on a Marxist/Socialist side.
Pace,
You are either completely illiterate when it comes to socio-economic terminology, or you are an agent provocateur, because I've NEVER posted ANYTHING that is remotely supportive of the Socialist or Marxist agendas.
In fact, it's quite the opposite. I feel that the main problem with the West, and capitalistic societies is that they are allowing themselves to be subtly and slowly morphed into Socialist Tyrannies through a progressive program of Fabian Socialism...
I hate all forms of tyranny. I especially despise the slow, sneaky, chiseling-away sort of "gradual Socialist revolution" that we are seeing here in the US and for the last 20 years or so in Western Europe.
Do you even know what Socialism and Marxism are? Do you even know where the Socialist and Communist nations got their start? I doubt it.
Go to a library and read something other than the blogs on Fox News's website. Go to the PRIMARY SOURCES, and as I say time and time again--follow the money.
THe USSR was funded--starting with the Bolshevic Revolution, and continuing up until it took it's last gasping breaths in 1991--by private international banks in New York, Chicago, London, and Brussels. It was backed by additional contributions--in direct violation of the Logan Act and the Trade with the Enemies Act--during the Cold War by banks chaird by members of the Bush family, the Rockefeller family, the Rothschilds, and others of a similar ilk.
Read the works of a fellow named Carroll Quigley. He was a a professor at the
School of Foreign Service at
Georgetown University, and was the official archivist for the CFR. He wrote a couple books called "The Anglo-American Establishment", and "Tragedy and Hope", which both document (from original source materials) just about everything I've posted. They are pretty dry, academic reads, and have thousands of cites and footnotes, but if you are interested in the REAL history of the West (rather than the Neo-Con revisionism you get on Fox, or the Pseudo-Marxist blehgle you get on CNN and MSNBC, or the dumbed-down utter fabrications you get in textbooks), then I recommend these books...
I'm not anti-capitalist, I'm anti-fascist. Most of these crazy-wealthy families are NOT capitalists--they are fascist monopolists.
Get your terms correct, read some REAL history, then we can talk.
I'm not a "conspiracy theorist". I just outline the actions being taken in plain view by these evil SOBs. I find the term "conspiracy theorist" is being used more and more these days the way that the term "communist" was used during the McCarthey era. Anyone who aledges something that is contrary to the mass-media message, or the official government-issued reality is branded as a "conspiracy" these days. I find this term to be intellectually dishonest, obfuscatory, and intentionally loaded. It's current usage is not based in any sort of truth or fact--it is a LABEL being thrown on people to discredit them when they present documentable facts that cannot be refuted. It is an "ad homenim" attack, and is the last refuge of the scoundrel.
Any time someone labels me a "conspiracy theorist" I take it as a srt of back-handed compliment, because it shows me what THEIR agenda REALLY is, and just vindicated my position. I pretty much just automatically dismiss people that make such allegations as either being completely brainwashed, or an agent provocateur. If you want some respect in these discussions, use some FACTS to back up your allegations...
Again, I will throw down the gauntlet. Prove anything I've said above wrong. Prove it with reliable citations from primary sources. I dare you...