He also didn't understand why he was charged with carrying a concealed weapon when he wore the gun in plain sight, as advised by colleagues.
His colleagues must not like him much, if they advised him to break the law. Or maybe they wanted him to be a test case for OC?
As for why he was charged with CC, well, the knives apparently weren't worn on his belt for everyone to see.
The gun, however, was obviously
visible, which is apparently what the sheeple objected to, which leads one to wonder why...:
Scott was charged with carrying a concealed firearm
Scott is charged with two counts of carrying a concealed firearm
yet:
A police log states he wore a Glock handgun at his hip
There are inconsistencies among the various news reports (no surprise):
Scott has been charged with three counts each of carrying a concealed firearm, carrying a concealed weapon and possession of a controlled substance without a prescription
I've just never been so humiliated in my life
Welcome to the real world. This is how the rest of us are treated.
He says he has an AZ permit, which according to this
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/news/concealed_carry.html is reciprocal with FL. So if he'd been concealing he'd've been fine.