We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :)
Please help by posting all issues here.
The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Guilt by association...or, approximate location. This case reinforces the fact that the cops' use of "high crime area", with the blessings of the court, are specious and clearly unconstitutional when claimed as justification for a cop to violate a citizen's individual liberties.
"Might" is the correct term and is used correctly if after discover a judge sides with the plaintiff...we ain't there yet. But, the reviewing courts ruling will (should) set the tone for the court overseeing the discovery phase.
The guy go screwed and everyone, even cops, know it, but cops don't care, they will violate your individual liberties at the drop of a hat.
Black's Law Dictionary - 6th. Might, v. The past tense of the word "may". Equivalent to "had power" or "was possible" or "have the physical or moral opportunity to be contingently possible."