It seems that the phone caller was not anonymous. Thus FL v. J.L. likely would not apply. The video making person should understand that a "good faith" phone caller making a phone call to the cops who knows that OC is unlawful, or believes it is, but does not know there is a exception or a defense against prosecution will not be prosecuted.
OC with a CCW permit is a exception to the prohibition to OC in my little town and thus a cop should not stop you just cuz he sees a gun OC. OC, and RAS is not present because the OCer must be presumed to be holding a CCW permit, the DL rule. Why else would a citizen OC if he does not have a CCW permit? Now, if the OCer does any little thing, spit on the sidewalk for example, to get the cop all in a twitter then RAS will be claimed to check for a permit.
Some localities give a defense against prosecution, the OCer is breaking the law and must display his stay outta jail card. OC, and RAS is present.