• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Interesting third circuit court op-ed interpretation


Regular Member
Aug 22, 2013
here nc
Ammoland has an interesting but seemly biased op-ed article [ https://www.ammoland.com/2018/12/third-circuit-second-amendment-is-a-second-rate-right/#ixzz5ZDbIMEkB ]Regarding the third circuit’s 5 december opinion, quote:

In a split decision, a three judge panel at the Third Circuit Court of Appeals effectively ruled the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights is a second-rate right, not entitled to the full protections of other enumerated rights. The opinion was filed on 5 December, 2018. The case is Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, Inc. v. Attorney General New Jersey, No. 18-3170 (3rd Cir. 2018).

The two majority judges followed the trend of other Circuits where the Second Amendment is being degraded and reduced to second-rate status. Only a month ago, the First Circuit ruled the Second Amendment does not apply outside of the home. Unquote.

The article goes on to lambast the USSC as well as highly highly praise the newly installed and ‘young’ jurist who presented a 19 page dissenting opinion.

Interesting read...won’t change a bloody thing, but interesting read!