Gunslinger
Regular Member
Cite, or it's just a moronic claim.
Why would someone take a more expensive product, and use it to treat a less expensive product. In the end, they LOSE MONEY!
On Noze, heroin in pot -- and they didn't tell you or CHARGE MORE!
I'd be more likely to believe someone saying Kratom abuse was prevalent among soldiers in Viet Nam. At least that would make logical sense (local drug with long term widespread use in rural areas, cheap, available, effective simulating mild narcotics).
Cite please
I did cite my source. And the fumes from the curing heroin cost nothing, so hanging weed over the fumes cost 'nothing.' True or not, I don't have any reason to disbelieve the Flight Surgeon and it made sense. Still does, what with the variety of drugs coming out of SEA back then. As I said, I didn't do drugs, so didn't really gas. As to being a "moronic" claim, where were you stationed during the war? Ever been to the Golden Triangle? Even know where it is? I'd suggest rethinking the use of 'moronic.'