• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

KY Court Calls Foul On Cop Who Seized a Gun to Run the Serial Number

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,278
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
Defendant was stopped at a roadblock. After checking, the officer handed back his paperwork, but then the cop noticed defendant’s handgun on the console. The officer reached in and seized it. The court found the detention was not legally justified, and reversed his conviction for disorderly conduct. A person with a gun is not automatically “armed and dangerous” nor a felon in possession. Pulley v. Commonwealth

Many thanks to John Hall at FourthAmendment.com for posting this on his blog.

For new readers, I cannot recommend this blog enough. Hall is a criminal defense attorney who also wrote a text on Fourth Amendment law. The blog serves as an on-going, daily update to the text.
 
Last edited:

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,417
Location
White Oak Plantation
Towards the end of the opinion.
The Sixth Circuit in Kennedy v. City of Villa Hills, Ky., 635 F.3d 210, 215-16 (6th Cir. 2011) (internal citation omitted), noted: [A]s the commentary to [KRS] 525.060 makes clear, Kentucky law does not criminalize arguments and noise that disturb only police officers because such conduct does not risk public alarm. . . . Indeed, because the First Amendment requires that police officers tolerate coarse criticism, the Constitution prohibits states from criminalizing conduct that disturbs solely police officers.

http://162.114.92.72/COA/2013-CA-00...32+113a+11bc+11cf+120d+1220+&hc=90&req=Pulley
Both of these cops need to be charged with criminal violations of federal and state laws. Talk about the prototypical contempt of cop situation. Those two cops are thugs of the highest order. How any citizen in the Commonwealth of KY would tolerate their tax dollars being expended to defend these two nitwits, let alone continue to employ these two is beyond me. They should be disbarred from any employment with any position in LE. The prosecutor should also be disbarred from the entire profession of law...permanently.

A mere taxpayer backed check is not sufficient to "train" the KSP or those two "troopers." A concerted public humiliation campaign is in order to inform the citizens of KY that their KSP is infested with hooligans willing to use the full weight of their government to harass, intimidate, and incarcerate law abiding in order to afflict the citizens of KY with tyranny of the highest order.

These two troopers are the epitome of anti-liberty and anti-citizen. They are a direct threat to the liberty and safety of the good citizens of KY.
 

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,337
Location
Nevada
Not so very good reviews on those.
Hmm, they do seem mixed. However, the concept is valid; buy some better ones! Mine are working, so far. I certainly have plenty to test...

I have so many, in fact, that I'll happily mail some to any who want them. PM me an address and how many you can use. We'll crowd source the testing!
 

countryclubjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
2,505
Location
nj
Towards the end of the opinion.Both of these cops need to be charged with criminal violations of federal and state laws. Talk about the prototypical contempt of cop situation. Those two cops are thugs of the highest order. How any citizen in the Commonwealth of KY would tolerate their tax dollars being expended to defend these two nitwits, let alone continue to employ these two is beyond me. They should be disbarred from any employment with any position in LE. The prosecutor should also be disbarred from the entire profession of law...permanently.

A mere taxpayer backed check is not sufficient to "train" the KSP or those two "troopers." A concerted public humiliation campaign is in order to inform the citizens of KY that their KSP is infested with hooligans willing to use the full weight of their government to harass, intimidate, and incarcerate law abiding in order to afflict the citizens of KY with tyranny of the highest order.

These two troopers are the epitome of anti-liberty and anti-citizen. They are a direct threat to the liberty and safety of the good citizens of KY.
+10000000000000000000000
I could not agree more, thugs with badges have no place in law enforcement. They should have been criminally charged under title USC 18- 241 and 242 for rights violations under color of law, followed by a 42 section 1983 law suit.
My .02
CCJ
 

countryclubjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
2,505
Location
nj
Hi Folks

Please allow me to suggest a great book concerning case law regarding U.S.C. 42 section 1983 cases, many success story's.

The book is titled "Section 1983 Litigation" by Michael G. Collins

Collins gives insight into redressing federal constitutional violations by state, and local officials.

A must read for all Constitutionalist.

Best regards

CCJ
 

CharleyCherokee

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
293
Location
WesternKy
Defendant was stopped at a roadblock. After checking, the officer handed back his paperwork, but then the cop noticed defendant’s handgun on the console. The officer reached in and seized it. The court found the detention was not legally justified, and reversed his conviction for disorderly conduct. A person with a gun is not automatically “armed and dangerous” nor a felon in possession. Pulley v. Commonwealth

Many thanks to John Hall at FourthAmendment.com for posting this on his blog.

For new readers, I cannot recommend this blog enough. Hall is a criminal defense attorney who also wrote a text on Fourth Amendment law. The blog serves as an on-going, daily update to the text.

Imagine reading a forum and finding out you won your case on appeal. Awesome.
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,383
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
We are not persuaded by the Commonwealth’s argument that the purpose of the traffic safety stop was not concluded before Trp. Fields contacted dispatch to check Pulley’s license and vehicle registration and, thus, also entering the serial number into a crime database the firearm’s registration check among those other checks did not extend or change the nature of the traffic safety stop.
The firearm’s registration check. What firearm’s registration check?????? Am I ever confused.....
 

CharleyCherokee

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
293
Location
WesternKy

Congratultions, CharleyCherokee. Thank you for sticking with it and fighting for the rights of all of us. We all owe you a great debt of gratitude. I'd like to know how you got in touch with Mr. Potter and the story of his involvement.
Mr. Potter is a public defender.
 

countryclubjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
2,505
Location
nj
This could be a 42 USC 1983 case. And I know all about 1983 suits.
I totally agree, the problem is finding an attorney that is willing to take on the local hero's especially a local attorney, I would suggest to the OP to seek counsel outside the state lines.

Best regards

CCJ
 

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,337
Location
Nevada
Thank you for a clarification for your state.

I don't want to derail this thread. It is very important on it own, but since the above is posted in the Ky. sub forum, by someone who is obviously unfamiliar with Ky. law, I feel compelled to let everyone know that the above is a very bad idea in this state....
 
Last edited:

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,383
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by color of law
This could be a 42 USC 1983 case. And I know all about 1983 suits.
I totally agree, the problem is finding an attorney that is willing to take on the local hero's especially a local attorney, I would suggest to the OP to seek counsel outside the state lines.

Best regards

CCJ
My point that I know all about 1983 suites is that My friend and attorney will go after any city of state.
The problem is that usually the state itself is sovereign. A subdivision of a state (city - town) is not sovereign. The issue has to be evaluated carefully and statute of limitations also must be looked at.
 

CharleyCherokee

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
293
Location
WesternKy
Yeah, but how did you meet him? Who put you in touch with him? How long has he been working on this? Did you have any problem getting his help? We want the whole store. Did he defend you in Circuit Court?
My first court appointed public defender asked for his help in the original hearing. The first appeal I wasn't at all involved in and it was mostly an automatic thing they did. After the first appeal Mr. Mills moved on to better things and Mr. Potter took over. His briefs were pretty much the same as Mr. Mills with the exception of more flair and added cites. The entire process from start to finish has taken approximately 2 years.
 

F350

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
942
Location
The High Plains of Wyoming
I don't want to derail this thread. It is very important on it own, but since the above is posted in the Ky. sub forum, by someone who is obviously unfamiliar with Ky. law, I feel compelled to let everyone know that the above is a very bad idea in this state. In fact, it would be a crime. Covering a serial number is illegal in Ky. Here is KRS 527.030:


http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=19958

And the word "deface" is defined in KRS 527.010, here:


http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=19956


This little prank could get you a year in jail.
527.010 Definitions for chapter.
The following definitions apply in this chapter unless the context otherwise requires:

(2) "Deface" means to remove, deface, cover, alter, or destroy the manufacturer's serial number or any other distinguishing number or identification mark


So, every S&W that ever left the factory with the Goncalo Alves target grips is illegal in KY??
http://www.terapeak.com/worth/smith...ips-goncalo-alves-wood-original/360754394434/

I ordered a S&W 642 from the factory with Crimson trace grips, they cover the SN, illegal in KY?? I have a S&W 686 I shot in the Bianchi Cup with Hogue rubber grips that are one piece and cover the bottom of the grip, illegal in KY?? I have a Remington 1100 12ga with a side saddle that covers the SN, illegal in KY?? Many after market accessories for firearms cover the SN, are they all illegal in KY??

I know we are addressing KY state law; but here is an e-mail I got back from BATFE if anyone was thinking along those lines...

FIPB Regulatory Email inquiries <FIPB@atf.gov>
9/19/12

to me
This is in response to your email to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). In your email, you wanted to know if covering a serial number of a firearm with tape be constituted as obscuring.

Under Federal law, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to transport, ship, or receive, in interstate or foreign commerce, any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed,
obliterated, or altered, or to possess or receive any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered and has, at any time, been shipped or transported
in interstate or foreign commerce.

Merely, attaching black tape to a firearms serial number does not constitute a violation of Federal law.

Should you have additional questions, please contact your local ATF office. A listing of ATF office phone numbers can be found at: http://www.atf.gov/field.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

notalawyer

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
1,061
Location
Florida
I don't want to derail this thread. It is very important on it own, but since the above is posted in the Ky. sub forum, by someone who is obviously unfamiliar with Ky. law, I feel compelled to let everyone know that the above is a very bad idea in this state. In fact, it would be a crime. Covering a serial number is illegal in Ky. Here is KRS 527.030:


http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=19958

And the word "deface" is defined in KRS 527.010, here:


http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=19956


This little prank could get you a year in jail.
Then you better be careful to never put extended grips on a J-Frame, or heck don't even think of carrying concealed, or using a gun sock or bag. Don't put anything in a range bag or even your trunk. :uhoh:
 
Top