wrightme
Regular Member
Brown's actual death should really not have been the point at all, until there is a determination as to whether the use of deadly force was justified or not. His death is the emotional hook that brings it to the fore.
No arguments from me. Wilson jumping straight to deadly force is what concerns me because it is increasingly the first option for many cops.Brown's actual death should really not have been the point at all, until there is a determination as to whether the use of deadly force was justified or not. His death is the emotional hook that brings it to the fore.
BS.
Next time you desire me to edit out references to something you said, do not expect me to agree.
Murderers don't have to kill everyone to still be murderers. In fact, one person is enough.
First of all, posting private message contents is against forum rules. Admin has been notified.
I misspoke about the edit, and meant post #650 which is the post in question. #655 is obviously the one that I already said I edited.There is no edit timestamp on post #650. It's impossible to lie about an edit because it tells you when you edit. You're more than welcome to check for a timestamp. Again, sorry for the confusion.
Also, scumbag move posting the private message. Says a lot about your character.
I still believe Wilson intended to kill Brown, not apprehend him. Agree to disagree I guess.
I didn't state my goal, I stated what I thought was the goal of Wilson, hence the statement, "So if you shoot someone in the head your intent is not to kill? HAHA. Yeah right!" Just want to clarify that.
QFTRFirst of all, posting private message contents is against forum rules. Admin has been notified.
I misspoke about the edit, and meant post #650 which is the post in question. #655 is obviously the one that I already said I edited.
There is no edit timestamp on post #650. It's impossible to lie about an edit because it tells you when you edit. You're more than welcome to check for a timestamp. Again, sorry for the confusion.
Also, scumbag move posting the private message. Says a lot about your character.
So if you shoot someone in the head your intent is not to kill? HAHA. Yeah right!
@wrightme I'm growing tired of the same chat about this. I've maintained the same if not identical opinion on this throughout, and outside of some super secret unknown evidence my opinion will not change.
No offense, but your arguments in the past have been painful and laborious to read (with WalkingWolf and others) and this thread is really no different. It's too tedious to have to explain the intent of every single word to someone who really can't argue anything but semantics. My opinion is very simple. Take it or leave it. If I didn't explicitly state something as my opinion, it is not my opinion no matter how hard you attempt to attribute certain meanings to my thoughts on these matters.
Once you post your words, you own them. If they are not correct, you are responsible for the error.
Where did that come from?So what's your point? You just want to continue this crap today? No thanks, I've already wasted enough time addressing your drivel. I don't have any desire to chat with someone who sees something that isn't there, and makes private comments public due to a personal vendetta. For the record, you reached out to me as to which posts I wished for you to edit and why, and I gave you the post (#655) and reasoning. I wasn't going to take it any further than a public suggestion so don't even pretend that I was the one who reached out to you via PM.
The Truth said:As for me stating I didn't edit post #655 instead of #650 which is what I meant (since that was the initial post regarding intent), get over it. It's not that big of a deal, and if you're going to judge my character based on a error in a post I made right before bed then there's no hope for this discussion as far as you are concerned.