jmelvin
Founder's Club Member
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/target-aims-stop-customers-carrying-guns
I know what my thoughts are. Hit it ladies and gentlemen.
I know what my thoughts are. Hit it ladies and gentlemen.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
MSNBC Poll: Do You Agree With Targets New Gun Request?
- Thread starter jmelvin
- Start date
jmelvin
Founder's Club Member
I certainly don't like the options given in the questions, but it's all they've got.
davidmcbeth
Banned
Do you think Target is reading this ?
Go contact the company itself ...
john.mulligan@target.com
There you go....send the ceo a letter
Go contact the company itself ...
john.mulligan@target.com
There you go....send the ceo a letter
davidmcbeth
Banned
I don't think that the CEO is stupider than a legislator...that's a tough one to beat.
Spooler41
Regular Member
I had to answer ,that it was a 2A violation. In the same vain, these open carriers with long arms have just shot
them selves in the foot. No need to being such negative attention to the cause, thats just plane stupid!
...................Jack
them selves in the foot. No need to being such negative attention to the cause, thats just plane stupid!
...................Jack
WalkingWolf
Regular Member
Not from what I see, Target instituted a opinion, a NON binding opinion. Nothing has changed other than the whining of OC Fudds. OTH OC Fudds post a picture of a man pointing a HANDGUN at the head of a little girl, not realizing this idiot not only had a handgun, but was a conceal carrier.
Is it not funny how silly Fudds can be when clouded with emotion.
deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
"No, the policy infringes on Second Amendment rights" Stupid available answers. Yes, they did the right thing for their stockholders and none of it anything to do with the 2nd Amendment.
hey sell widgets. The don't want to waste time listening to women demanding crap unless it is more widgets for which they are willing to pay Target more money. They don't care about guns obviously as for years they were like WalMart and many others - we follow the laws where the store is located. But now it is an issue, in great part because of our fellow OC supporters. So Target took a non-committal way out - we ask you not to carry guns into the store but we aren't going to post signs or anything about it - please carry on with your shopping. I would have done the same darn thing. It is Target's job to sell widgets and make money for stockholders, not argue about gun rights on either side.
I'll continue to go to Target as much as I ever did.
hey sell widgets. The don't want to waste time listening to women demanding crap unless it is more widgets for which they are willing to pay Target more money. They don't care about guns obviously as for years they were like WalMart and many others - we follow the laws where the store is located. But now it is an issue, in great part because of our fellow OC supporters. So Target took a non-committal way out - we ask you not to carry guns into the store but we aren't going to post signs or anything about it - please carry on with your shopping. I would have done the same darn thing. It is Target's job to sell widgets and make money for stockholders, not argue about gun rights on either side.
I'll continue to go to Target as much as I ever did.
since9
Campaign Veteran
The poll looks fairly accurate to me...
