farkles
Regular Member
http://www.scribd.com/full/23885722?access_key=key-1h8hbcdrbbh357tgtc9o
After reading that table comparison in the article above, I think I actually agree. Look at the old NC law that allowed some leniency after some period of time for some firearms only for NON VIOLENT felons. Not sure what all would fall under non-violent felon, but I think it could make sense to loosen up those laws again.
There are many victimless crimes that would be considered felonies, that should not restrict your ability to own all weapons. Right now I could only come up with one example: possession of a firearm (or really any other weapon) on a school campus. Even an inadvertent possession 1 foot over the school boundary line could score you a felony charge technically. Should that restrict you from forever possessing any firearm for self defense, after never hurting, or threatening to hurt anyone?
After reading that table comparison in the article above, I think I actually agree. Look at the old NC law that allowed some leniency after some period of time for some firearms only for NON VIOLENT felons. Not sure what all would fall under non-violent felon, but I think it could make sense to loosen up those laws again.
There are many victimless crimes that would be considered felonies, that should not restrict your ability to own all weapons. Right now I could only come up with one example: possession of a firearm (or really any other weapon) on a school campus. Even an inadvertent possession 1 foot over the school boundary line could score you a felony charge technically. Should that restrict you from forever possessing any firearm for self defense, after never hurting, or threatening to hurt anyone?