Are "No Weapons" signs legal for a public event on BLM controlled land (Empire Ranch)? Can anyone reference a statute or precedence? What's the process for fighting this crap?
https://www.blm.gov/documents/arizo...ct-nw-tucson-recreational-target-shooting-map
"Public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are available for a variety of undeveloped recreational activities, including target shooting except where prohibited by federal, state, and local laws.
SNIP...
General public land regulations excerpted below apply to lands administered by the BLM, except within the Ironwood Forest National Monument, which is closed to recreational target shooting.
The target shooting closure does not prohibit lawful possession of firearms or hunting according to Arizona hunting regulations. Shooters are responsible for knowing applicable laws and using firearms and other sport shooting weapons in a safe manner."
My guess is the law that would apply would be ARS 13-3102, specifically the part about a sponsor of a public event asking you to either disarm or leave.
ARS Title 13 said:
13-3102. Misconduct involving weapons; defenses; classification; definitions
A. A person commits misconduct involving weapons by knowingly:
SNIP...
10. Unless specifically authorized by law, entering any public establishment or attending any public event and carrying a deadly weapon on his person after a reasonable request by the operator of the establishment or the sponsor of the event or the sponsor's agent to remove his weapon and place it in the custody of the operator of the establishment or the sponsor of the event for temporary and secure storage of the weapon pursuant to section 13-3102.01
SNIP...