Costco is an anti American company. that don't believe in citizens defending them selves
the LV police staged a shooting and got away with it. i don't care waht the offical papers say, they were set
by the offenders (why didn't the LEOs have to have a drug test). but that's in the past. nothing we can do about it now
really moving on
There is no standard/authoritah under which shooters (at least in my jurisdiction) are required to take a drug test. That holds true for cops and noncops. I've investigated plenty. There is certainly nothing to prevent a shooter (or anybody else under the sun) to volunteer to take a drug test. Heck, you could volunteer for one right now.
Why should the LEO's have to have a drug test if involved in the shooting? Is there some policy that requires it?
If you were involved in a shooting, would you volunteer for a drug test? I suspect with many people, if there were specific articulable facts that led to suspicion they were on drugs when the shooting happened, and they weren't, they might feel it's better to CYA and take a drug test, to take that wind out of the sails, especially for a civil trial where it would be more of an issue.
There might be some PD out there that has a policy requiring ofc's involved in a shooting to take a drug test, but I've never heard of such a thing.
That's groovy that you are moving on, and nobody is requiring you to respond, but since you threw it out there into the intertoobs, this question about why the cops didn't take a drug test, I feel it is my duty to set the record straight
1) I see no specific articulable facts to suspect they were on any drugs
2) I am not aware of any agency that requires their ofc's to submit to drug tests when in a shooting, and if las vegas metro doesn't require it , that would be par for the course
3) you clearly don;'t like the conclusions of the investigations into the shooting, but that's no excuse to "cast asparagus"
with this drug test thang