ERPO is part of the Triad and a potential threat to anyone. These "temporarily" bypass due process for the supposed sake of safety. Heavily promoted post-Parkland.
GOA seems to be on top of the issue:
https://gunowners.org/emergency-confiscation-is-easy-target-in-new-gun-control-congress.htm
https://gunowners.org/goa-rebukes-trump-s-inclusion-of-gun-confiscation-in-school-safety-report.htm
My take: there is a need for safety, but safety does not require bypassing due process. Parkland occurred not because of lacking tools, but because of official regional government plans and programs designed to bypass safety in favor of other social goals, together with regional government corruption reducing competency. Thus ERPO is not a solution for the problem, it's an agenda for which the problem was an opportunity to promote.
ERPO is gaining popularity. It can affect everyone, certainly including OCers. Of the Triad (Bump, ERPO, Age 21) it's the one with the most potential to affect all varieties and demographics of gun owners. What's the best way to oppose it?
Besides contacting WH and Congress, I think I will be keeping up my membership in GOA, if it has lapsed I will renew it. They are currently active on Bump, ERPO, and other issues. With a larger membership, they might be a good path to improvements. (Ya think?)
GOA seems to be on top of the issue:
https://gunowners.org/emergency-confiscation-is-easy-target-in-new-gun-control-congress.htm
Opponents warn that "red flag" orders can be abused and violate due process. So why are they attracting Republican support?
And expect the judges to sign off on most if not all of them: “When you are the only guys in the room you can get the judge to sign a ham sandwich.
https://gunowners.org/goa-rebukes-trump-s-inclusion-of-gun-confiscation-in-school-safety-report.htm
Gun Owners of America (GOA) is opposing President Donald Trump’s inclusion Gun Confiscation Orders (sugar-coated as “red-flag laws”) in his Commission on School Safety Report.
My take: there is a need for safety, but safety does not require bypassing due process. Parkland occurred not because of lacking tools, but because of official regional government plans and programs designed to bypass safety in favor of other social goals, together with regional government corruption reducing competency. Thus ERPO is not a solution for the problem, it's an agenda for which the problem was an opportunity to promote.
ERPO is gaining popularity. It can affect everyone, certainly including OCers. Of the Triad (Bump, ERPO, Age 21) it's the one with the most potential to affect all varieties and demographics of gun owners. What's the best way to oppose it?
Besides contacting WH and Congress, I think I will be keeping up my membership in GOA, if it has lapsed I will renew it. They are currently active on Bump, ERPO, and other issues. With a larger membership, they might be a good path to improvements. (Ya think?)