Sadistic child-hating cop shoots five kittens in front of children

[Firearms Iinstuctor]

monarchist

The children would not be mentally injured or affected in any way if they were sat down and had it explained to them what was happening and why.

No its is BS pushed by the progressives and anti hunting, anti gun ownership, anti freedom types that is damaging them.

Turning them into weak, we need help, we can't do anything for our selves subjects of the state.

Good citizens are trained from a young age to work through problems, be independent , think for them selves and do what is responsible.

To look at a problem see the solution fix it and move on.

Not to be wimps unable to take care of a simple problem like of a few stray cats with out becoming emotionally up set about it.

 

[ron73440]

Reminds me of an experience my girlfriend had... She heard some meek squealing and further investigation revealed a baby squirrel that had been partially mauled by a dog. She was on private property in a rural area and thought the only thing she could do was put it out of it's misery so...

She pulled out her sidearm and shot it... with her eyes closed. She didn't want to see the impact so the shot hit the squirrel, but didn't do the job. She shot it again... with her eyes closed... the shot hit the squirrel, but didn't do the job.

The fifth shot did the job because she kept her eye on the target. She learned her lesson.

Reminds me of when I was about 13 and we were killing all of our chickens and my Aunt (fom the city) wanted to kill one.

She closed her eyes...swung the hatchet...and cut off the chicken's beak!

Dad gave her a disgusted look took the hatchet from her, gave it to me and said "a damn boy can do better than you." I put the poor thing out of its' misery.

Good times, we killed about 120 chickens that day, just because Dad wanted to sell eggs, but bought meat chickens that laid eggs once a week by mistake.

 

[ccwinstructor]

If you cannot bring yourself to kill a pest, How will you be able to defend yourself

Reminds me of when I was about 13 and we were killing all of our chickens and my Aunt (fom the city) wanted to kill one.

She closed her eyes...swung the hatchet...and cut off the chicken's beak!

Dad gave her a disgusted look took the hatchet from her, gave it to me and said "a damn boy can do better than you." I put the poor thing out of its' misery.

Good times, we killed about 120 chickens that day, just because Dad wanted to sell eggs, but bought meat chickens that laid eggs once a week by mistake.

You make a good point. Being able to make difficult decisions and being able to accomplish disagreeable tasks takes practice. If you are unable to dispatch a simple pest, how will a person be able to accomplish the much more difficult task of defending themselves or someone else?

 

[WalkingWolf]

I raise chickens, cull, and process them. There is big difference between using a proper method to cull a chicken, and discharging a firearm near a residence. And a residence with minor children in it at that, what the dog catcher cop did was irresponsible. I don't care if he was just shooting into the ground, he needs another job.

 

[Firearms Iinstuctor]

I raise chickens, cull, and process them. There is big difference between using a proper method to cull a chicken, and discharging a firearm near a residence. And a residence with minor children in it at that, what the dog catcher cop did was irresponsible. I don't care if he was just shooting into the ground, he needs another job.

You don't know that he could very well have had adequate back stop the children good have been well out of the way.

Just because their is a child around or near a residence doesn't make it dangerous to discharge a gun.

Heck if that was the case I never would be able to shoot in my front or back yards nor would I been able to teach my children and their friends how to shoot.

 

[WalkingWolf]

You don't know that he could very well have had adequate back stop the children good have been well out of the way.

Just because their is a child around or near a residence doesn't make it dangerous to discharge a gun.

Heck if that was the case I never would be able to shoot in my front or back yards nor would I been able to teach my children and their friends how to shoot.

There are and were much better options, the dog catcher is a idiot who should not be trusted with a gun. At the very least he could have collected them and snapped their necks, as far as culling outside beheading it is the most used method by country folk. Those claiming to be country folk and are defending shooting kittens are probably liars.

 

[Firearms Iinstuctor]

There are and were much better options, the dog catcher is a idiot who should not be trusted with a gun. At the very least he could have collected them and snapped their necks, as far as culling outside beheading it is the most used method by country folk. Those claiming to be country folk and are defending shooting kittens are probably liars.

Beheading for birds and rabbits for sure if one can catch them.

Shot more then a few of them that were escapees that became to wild to catch over a summer of living around the farm.

A head shot chicken or rabbit really doesn't taste any different then one that's head is wacked off with a axe.

 

[WalkingWolf]

Beheading for birds and rabbits for sure if one can catch them.

Shot more then a few of them that were escapees that became to wild to catch over a summer of living around the farm.

A head shot chicken or rabbit really doesn't taste any different then one that's head is wacked off with a axe.

These were kittens, that did not run off, and the mama cat got away because he was blasting. He is a moron! Animal control has a assortment of tools to use. If he used the net, or the pole he would have also got the mother. Plastic bags for roadside pickup. If the kittens did not run it was because they were not old enough. The man was a pure complete utter dangerous idiot. The farm argument is stupid because there is not one real farmer that would have used a gun in this case. He was allowed a firearm for his self defense the same as any other officer, he used it for his entertainment. PERIOD!

I only use a firearm when there is absolutely no other way, as in a attacking dog, or a rabid fox, or snarling possum, an animal that can do harm. He had gloves to pick up the kittens without injury, he had a pole and a net. And probably a tranquilizer to use on the mother. He wanted to shoot those kittens because he is sick, sick, sick.

 

[Firearms Iinstuctor]

WalkingWolf your arguments are sounding better all the time.

 

[marshaul]

WalkingWolf your arguments are sounding better all the time.

Indeed.

 

[KYGlockster]

Not necessarily so. And 'solitary" is a punishment for bad behavior. "Administrative segregation" is a managment tool. Protective custody is for those with known enemies. Get them straight!

Depending on the system, former cops and child abusers may not automatically be placed in PC. Some systems require that a specific credible threat be made by a specific individual. Seems to depend on how much room is available to dedicate to PC.

You are correct that most of them are not treated "poorly". They are the ones who know how to keep their mouth shut and do their time. Mind your own business, do only your own time, and keep your mouth about why you are there will more than likely get you through unharmed. The ones that seem to think they can be as big and bad inside as they thought they were outside do not do so well. Spend almost 20 years getting out of prison every night to go home teaches you a few things.

stay safe.

Solitary is a common word used to pronounce all forms of isolation in a detention facility. You can label it what you want, but it is solitary confinement when someone is placed into a cell by themselves with no one else in the same cell.

I deal with it every day of my life, and I can ASSURE you this man will never see another person unless he has a detention official escorting him somewhere.

 

[Daylen]

You're yet another strawman lover: I am ridiculing the cop for the mental damage to the children, not for the deaths of the kittens.



I'm not the one who is arguing against a strawman.

so?

I highly doubt that you'd refrain from b!tching if some psychopath did something traumatizing, such as torturing some person, in front of young children whom you're related to.

Perhaps you should learn to argue better, indubitably your argument lacks logic as no one else can even follow it. What does the above quote have to do with the cop or incident at hand?

ps I never did address your conclusions, only the seeming path you were taking to get there.