• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sheep Pasture 2

marshaul

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
11,188
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia
Go back and read Post #11. I contributed to the "it's a rare opportunity to demonstrate the inadequacy of their position by comparison." Yes, I dumped on liberals then too.

I find it ironic that liberals prefer to be called progressive and not liberal, why is that?

Focusing on my use of the term liberal, incidentally, detracts from the point (whatever the point happens to be). I, being distracted by responding to your chastisements, is detracting from the point also.

I get it, you don't like me using liberal. I ain't gunna stop using liberal. I have demonstrated this time and again. Your move Sir.

I get that. But your misuse of the term "liberal" continuously detracts from the point, to no less a degree than does my focusing on it. Not to mention it's insulting to the numerous classical liberals on the forum.

Finally, neo-leftists don't prefer "progressive" because "liberal" is the uber-insult you seem to think it is ("progressive" is far worse, anyway). They prefer it because they know damn well that their agenda isn't "liberal". They know this because their obsessive hate of "neo-liberal economics" leaves no doubt that their economic policies are not liberal.

(Not to defend "neo-liberal economics", by which they really mean Reaganomics, which is Keynesian tax-and-spend economics disguised by the rhetoric of Austrian economics.)
 
Last edited:
Top