sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
Paranoia...What would you think?
LOL...it's not "paranoia" to fear the government and their street soldiers. Act like they are all out to get you is not being paranoid it's being smart.
Last edited:
Paranoia...What would you think?
Correct. The reason not to talk to Police is because you can not know what RAS they have is and by this example you may create it by talking or moving. Also you do not have the right to know what the RAS might be. The officer must only articulate it to the court after the fact.
Don't talk to the police.
Some with JD's I have talked to disagree with no reason being needing to be articulated at the scene, without articulated reason you have no reason to cooperate with the detention and what may very well be a false arrest.
The basis I have brought up before that this may be illegal, by the fourth amendment and our state constitution, Article 1 section 7.
Must they formally charge you later and before a judge yes. That is a seperate issue than informing you at the scene why you are being detained.
Either way we see it your way or mine, Absolutely don't talk to cops.
Paranoia...What would you think?
No, not necessarily. Which officer is going to be the next Birk, the next Meade.... due caution is required.
1. The prudent citizen believes that all cops are bad until the citizen discovers that not all cops are bad....one cop at a time.Arrest.544.180. An arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person of the defendant, or by his submission to the custody of the officer, under authority of a warrant or otherwise. The officer must inform the defendant by what authority he acts, and must also show the warrant if required.
http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C500-599/5440000180.HTM
No, not necessarily. Which officer is going to be the next Birk, the next Meade.... due caution is required.
LOL...it's not "paranoia" to fear the government and their street soldiers. Act like they are all out to get you is not being paranoid it's being smart.