SGT Jensen wrote:
I always wonder about people that begin their posts with "I'm all for (insert subject here), but... :?
You guys are looking at this from the wrong point of view. Who cares if one state recognizes another, or if one issues permit to non-residents. You should be thinking "Gosh, it sure would be nice if concealed carry was not ILLEGAL in 48 effing states!!! After all, people want us to cover our sidearms, shouldn't they make it easier to do so?
So far, only two states have figured it out. Alaska and Vermont. But until the day comes when Utah repeals the law that criminalizes concealed carry, we have to deal with a stupid card. A card that happens to allow concealed carry in more that half of the states.
Who are you to tell me what view to look at it from? "Gosh, wouldnt it be nice" is just wishing, platitudes, fakery. I look at reality, even though it sucks. It sucks to have so much oversight, it sucks to have to have to jump through so many hoops. SO what, thatsHOW it is for now, and Im ALL for lobbying to change things. But why are you side stepping and skirting the issues Ive brought up? My opinion is just as valuable and valid as yours. You seem to want to squash anyone that has "opposition" that doenst meet your OWN personal agenda. I think you need to step back a bit and look at how what YOUR doing may be ultimately destroying what you say you want. Look at it from that view, since apparently its ok to invalidate anyone who opposes you.
Is there any way someone on this board who disagrees with me can just answer and respond to my questions? Without all the vitrol and anger?
