Pa. Patriot
State Researcher
imported post
apjonas wrote:
Re-read the statute and try to interpret in plain english.
The statute deals directly with "Posting" against "intruders", IE: Trespass in general. NOT certain rules/allowed behavior, etc.
"No Guns", "No cell phones", or other type signs do not fit the scope of the statute.
It's right there in black and white/ Posting against intruders!
If you don't get it by now, you never will.
Another good thread to read:
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/conceale...governing-no-guns-signs-having-no-weight.html
apjonas wrote:
You are certainly right about the bolded part.
No purpose is achieved by repeating my references and analysis. You are so invested in your urban legend that I cannot convince you no matter what. An easy way to find out who is correct is for you to OC at a business that has a no guns" sign - after you ask the Chief of Police to meet you there.
Re-read the statute and try to interpret in plain english.
The statute deals directly with "Posting" against "intruders", IE: Trespass in general. NOT certain rules/allowed behavior, etc.
"No Guns", "No cell phones", or other type signs do not fit the scope of the statute.
It's right there in black and white/ Posting against intruders!
If you don't get it by now, you never will.
Another good thread to read:
http://www.pafoa.org/forum/conceale...governing-no-guns-signs-having-no-weight.html