Michigan_Man
Regular Member
imported post
CV67PAT wrote
As for "unfounded accusations of insult" I refer to you as evidence the video you posted regarding proper methods of posting involving a fictional character named Billy. While I certainly understand the impulse to double down on your incorrect assertions and just insult more, deny facts, and conjure conspiracy theories about pseudonyms, no hard feelings will exist should you choose to end this belligerence.
CV67PAT wrote
This is not an argument. Please re-submit another response which either asserts or contests a given proposition.Your post proves only that you and your pseudonym are too narrow minded to be reasoned with in a logical manner. You have manipulated your statements to rationalize your unfounded accusations of insult.
I doubt that the site owners are attempting to suppress speech. Only improper speech that is in violation of the coc.
As for "unfounded accusations of insult" I refer to you as evidence the video you posted regarding proper methods of posting involving a fictional character named Billy. While I certainly understand the impulse to double down on your incorrect assertions and just insult more, deny facts, and conjure conspiracy theories about pseudonyms, no hard feelings will exist should you choose to end this belligerence.