XD Owner
Regular Member
imported post
I received a letter of apology from the Virginia Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles, D.B. Smit.
The relevant paragraphs of the letter read as follows:
“If an individual is observed carrying a firearm in a DMV Office and is acting in a non-threatening manner, it is DMV policy to notify the security officer on duty at that time. The security officer and DMV personnel are to observe the individual, but no action is to be taken.
Neither DMV personnel nor the security officer are to approach the individual or contact local law enforcement without first contacting DMV Law Enforcement Services. Unfortunately, the manager of the Alexandria officer and the security officer on duty failed to follow established procedures, and contacted local law enforcement instead. I apologize for this but can assure you they took this action only because they were concerned about the potential safety of our employees and customers. Please be assured that we have taken steps to ensure that all security officers and DMV personnel are aware of the procedures to follows in situations such as yours.”
I have not seen the written response from the Alexandria Police Department since I am currently overseas. My better half says she got a letter requesting $20 to pay for my Freedom of Information Act request. I am waiting to get the actual letter and will then decide what to do. My first impression is that it would be a waste of money.
Attached is a copy of the two page letter. I hope you find this useful in case anything similar happens. I didn't even know there was such a thing as DMV Law Enforcement Services.
If a security guard approaches you, just say he is violating DMV policy and to contact DMV Law Enforcement Services per the established procedures. I will assume that everyone here acts in a non-threatening manner.
I still can't believe that titling a vehicle purchased at the end of the lease is a complicated transaction. (Sorry, getting off subject here.)
I received a letter of apology from the Virginia Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles, D.B. Smit.
The relevant paragraphs of the letter read as follows:
“If an individual is observed carrying a firearm in a DMV Office and is acting in a non-threatening manner, it is DMV policy to notify the security officer on duty at that time. The security officer and DMV personnel are to observe the individual, but no action is to be taken.
Neither DMV personnel nor the security officer are to approach the individual or contact local law enforcement without first contacting DMV Law Enforcement Services. Unfortunately, the manager of the Alexandria officer and the security officer on duty failed to follow established procedures, and contacted local law enforcement instead. I apologize for this but can assure you they took this action only because they were concerned about the potential safety of our employees and customers. Please be assured that we have taken steps to ensure that all security officers and DMV personnel are aware of the procedures to follows in situations such as yours.”
I have not seen the written response from the Alexandria Police Department since I am currently overseas. My better half says she got a letter requesting $20 to pay for my Freedom of Information Act request. I am waiting to get the actual letter and will then decide what to do. My first impression is that it would be a waste of money.
Attached is a copy of the two page letter. I hope you find this useful in case anything similar happens. I didn't even know there was such a thing as DMV Law Enforcement Services.
If a security guard approaches you, just say he is violating DMV policy and to contact DMV Law Enforcement Services per the established procedures. I will assume that everyone here acts in a non-threatening manner.
I still can't believe that titling a vehicle purchased at the end of the lease is a complicated transaction. (Sorry, getting off subject here.)